You are currently browsing the archives for the West Papua category.

NEW MATILDA EXCLUSIVE (30.11.2011): DETAINED PAPUAN LEADERS SPEAK OUT

December 6th, 2011

Dear activists in solidarity with
human rights for all and especially those whose rights are under threat eg the West Papuans

Below is a report in New Matilda re
the West Papuan leaders who were arrested and tortured last
month.


I encourage all to demand that
given the genocide and gross human rights abuses committed by
the TNI, to contact their politicial leaders to demand that
to military aid should be given to the TNI until the Indonesian government:

* withdraws the TNI from West Papua and allows the UN to conduct an   independence referendum of the population
* sends all the war criminals in the ranks of the TNI to the International Criminal Court to face justice
* pays compensation to all victims of TNI crimes in East Timor, West Papua, Acheh and Indonesia itself

Thanks

Andy Alcock

30 Nov 2011

EXCLUSIVE: Detained Papuan Leaders Speak Out

New Matilda has obtained the first interview with West Papuan leaders detained after last month’s violent crackdown on the Third Papuan People’s Congress in Jayapura.

Alex Rayfield reports:

The man who was last month elected President of the
‘Federal Republic of West Papua’ after a
declaration of independence by the third Papuan People’s Congress may be behind bars, he may have been savagely beaten by the Indonesian police, but he has not
been silenced.

From his five by four metre cell in the bowels of the Jayapura Police Station — quarters he shares with five other Papuans also charged with rebellion against the Indonesian state — Forkorus Yaboisembut
recently issued a rousing call to action, which was smuggled out of the prison and obtained by New Matilda.

“To all the Papuan people,” Yaboisembut writes, “don’t be afraid to celebrate December 1, whether you do so simply, or as part of large
gatherings. Do not be afraid because we, the Papuan people, do not intend to destroy any country; we only wish to defend our political rights.”

1 December marks the anniversary of the first raising of the Morning Star flag in 1961. Along with many other Papuan activists, Yaboisembut was arrested after Indonesian security forces opened fire on the Congress meeting on 19 October. At least six people died during the attack.

This is the first time Yaboisembut has spoken to Western media since his arrest. Our discussion is constrained by time and space but I
can picture the tribal elder from previous meetings. He is a quietly spoken man who is getting on in years but is still strong and alert. He walks tall, sits up straight and dresses neatly. His short hair and longish grey beard gives him the look of an Old Testament prophet.

When Yaboisembut was arrested last month he was tortured
so badly that he could barely sit or stand. Dominikus Surabut, from the West Papua Council of Customary Tribal Chiefs, who was also detained and badly tortured, told New Matilda that police beat Yaboisembut mercilessly with a rifle butt, raining blows down on his head and crashing their weapons into his abdomen. In a widely published Indonesian language account of the arrest, a religious leader said that an Indonesian soldier was ready to shoot him dead but was urged not to by a policeman.

Yaboisembut believes West Papuans’ political rights are inalienable. “Whether you take the United Nations founding document, the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Political Rights or even the Indonesian Constitution as your starting point, Papuans have the right to self-determination,” he says.

“The preamble to the 1945 Indonesian Constitution mentions expressly, that independence is the right of all nations, and because
of this colonialism must be swept away, it is consistent with the principles of justice and humanity. Consequently, the people of Papua cannot be blamed in accordance with any law for wanting to celebrate their national day.”

These ideas, the same ideas that inspired Indonesians to liberate themselves from Dutch rule, are igniting the imagination of entire
generation who want to be free from Indonesian oppression. What makes Yaboisembut’s ideas even more extraordinary is that he is urging an insurrection that is grounded in what he calls “human dignity”.

“1 December 2011 is the 50th anniversary of when Papuans first raised the Morning Star flag. It is our golden anniversary,” he says. “It
must be celebrated in an atmosphere of peace, safety and calm”.

“To Papuans, I therefore say, do not carry out acts of terror, intimidation or commit violence of any kind towards anyone, for whatever reason, whether they are Papuan or migrants.

Those arrested in the wake of the Third Papuan Congress are not backing down from the declaration of independence made on the final day of the gathering. Selphius Bobii, who also shares a cell with Yaboisembut and is the chair of the Congress committee, told New Matilda: “We are committed to using people power, diplomacy and the law to achieve our rights”.

Dominikus Surabut says that he and the other prisoners are refusing to sign police statements charging them with “rebellion” (makar)
under sections 106 and 110 of the Indonesian Criminal Code.

“We have done nothing wrong” Surabut says. “We have a political right to declare independence. We do not seek to destroy Indonesia or any other country. On the contrary, it is the Indonesia state that has attacked us.”

How can it be, they ask, that the Indonesian police get written warnings for killing Papuans when Papuan activists nonviolently
exercising their rights to freedom of expression are beaten and jailed?

Is this the same country that Barack Obama and Julia Gillard recently lauded as a beacon of democracy?

In a widely published letter in support of Papuan political prisoners, Human Rights Watch says that the articles under which the six Papuan political prisoners have been charged “are a legacy from the Dutch
colonial era”. Charging nonviolent activists with rebellion is, they write, “in violation of the Indonesian Constitution, Articles 28(e) and 28(f) which respectively afford ‘the right to the freedom of association and expression of opinion’, and ‘the right to communicate and obtain information…’.”

The charge of rebellion is also inconsistent with Indonesia’s international obligations under the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, which Indonesia ratified in 2006, a point which the jailed Papuan leaders make repeatedly to me. Besides, the Papuan leaders say, they have been left with no other option. “Special Autonomy has totally failed and even the MRP [Papuan People’s Council], a state institution, convened a meeting which came up with eleven recommendations, one of which was to hold the Third Papuan Congress.”

Outside their police cell, in the cities and towns of West Papua, a new political consensus is emerging. This consensus has been forged not through endless meetings of the Diaspora or in discussions with
political elites in Jakarta — but on the streets. It is simply this: that West Papua must be free.

After the Congress, three overlapping political groupings have emerged: the Papuan Peace Network, which is calling for political
dialogue; the West Papua National Committee, which demands a referendum; and the Papua Congress leaders.

The killing of at least six nonviolent Papuans by the Indonesian police and military on 19 October has divided ordinary Indonesians,
flushing out ultra-nationalists and their racist discourse, and outraging political moderates longing for a different kind of future than the one left to them by former dictator Suharto.

Inside Papua the massacre appears to be having a unifying effect — although Papuan politics remain complex. The West Papua National Committee, who opposed the Congress, later marched in support of the six political prisoners. Father Neles Tebay, respected intellectual and leader of the Papua Peace Network, has intensified the demand for political dialogue.


It is a call that has been supported by Yaboisembut and others.

“All Papuans, wherever they are, must respect the dialogue process democratically initiated through the Papuan Peace Conference and the Papuan Peace Network,” says Yaboisembut.

Whether the Indonesian police and military will act in a similarly dignified manner remains to be seen.

As I write this, a long-term Papuan human rights activist sends me this message: “There’s an increase of military patrol of soldiers around Jayapura Township.” Some put the numbers as high as 40,000.
Reports are filtering in of troop surges in Sorong, Paniai (where gunshots have been heard), the border region and Jayapura.

“The atmosphere here is quiet but eerie,” my friend writes. We are all waiting to see what 1 December will bring.

With West Papua
Media
.

DEATH OF INDONESIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST ASMARA NABABAN – HIS SPEECH ON TL’S 10TH ANNIVERSARY IN MELBOURNE

October 30th, 2010

 

Human rights activist Asmara Nababan dies

The Jakarta Post, Jakarta 28/10/2010

Former secretary-general of the Indonesian National Commission for Human Rights Asmara Nababan passed away at noon on 28/10/2010 in the Fuda Hospital, Guangzho, China, from lung cancer. He was 64.

Asmara’s family was waiting for confirmation from China on when the deceased would be transported to Indonesia, said Asmara’s nephew, Putra Nababan.

Born in Siborong-borong, North Tapanuli, North Utara on Sept. 2, 1946, Asmara was known as a human rights activist. He once joined the joint fact-finding team (TPGF) during the May 1998 chaos and the Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy (ELSAM).

————————————————————————————————————–

Below is his speech at Concert at Federation Square, Melbourne, to commemorate the 10th anniversary of East Timor’s ballot on independence.
——————————————————————————————————-

It is a great honor for me to attend this very special event, namely the commemoration of the first decade of the “The Moment of Truth” when the people of Timor Leste took upon the decision to end Indonesia’s occupation.

The decision to end the 25 years of unremitting repression of Soeharto’s military regime against the nation. The end of Soeharto’s regime and the dawn of democracy in Indonesia opened the opportunity for the people of Timor Leste to finally able to take it upon themselves to decide their own destiny.

This political decision is final, accepted and respected by the International Community, including Indonesia. The question of Timor Leste seemed to have been answered. It is now a State established by the support of the International Community and have embarked in the journey to deliver its people to prosperity.


Thus, should one assume that the problem of Timor Leste has been resolved? The answer is, unfortunately, no.

There remains to be an unresolved issue, that of the rights of victims of human rights violations that have been committed during the occupation. We are all aware of the inquiry commissions established to put an end to this matter. The United Nations and Indonesia respectively created their own soon after the referendum, The Truth Commission (CAVR) was established by the government of Timor Lester, and the governments of the two States were also engaged in the collective effort in form The Truth and Friendship Commission. All named above had reached the conclusion that crimes against humanity had been committed by Indonesia’s military and police prior to and after the referendum. These serious crimes had never been subjected to just resolution in accordance to international standards. Human Rights Ad hoc Tribunal in Jakarta as well as UN Special Panel within Dili District Court failed to deliver the justice.

The truth has been revealed and no party is denying it, yet there is a failure to pursue justice upon that truth. The political interests of both governments, Indonesia and Timor Leste, as well as that of the major players in this issue such as USA and Australia, had impeded the endeavor to uphold justice.

With regards to CAVR and CTF for example- both commissions had produced reports that have been subjected to the same cold-shoulder response as the initial reaction to the Stolen Generation Report here in Australia. In Timor-Leste, the parliament has continued to delay the debate and acknowledgement of the CAVR and CTF reports.

In Indonesia, although the President accepted the findings of the CTF report, there has been little follow-up and dissemination. Not many peoples in Indonesia aware of this documents and their magnitudes. The CAVR report which contains a more comprehensive accounting of the crimes committed from 1975-1999 has never been officially accepted by Indonesia. It is as if both governments decided that after revealing the truth of the horrific crimes, the people, including the victims, should just accept it and move forward with their lives without expecting any just redress to all of the atrocities.

From Indonesia’s stand point, the stance to forgive and forget past crimes has been taken not only with regards to Timor Leste. There exists a long list of gross human rights violations committed by Soeharto’s military regime, starting from the 65 & 66 massacre to the 1998 riots, all over the State’s territory, from Papua to Aceh. The perpetrators enjoyed impunity and even occupied public positions. Some of them were Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates in our last election. In such situation the hope to achieve justice for the millions of victims of human rights violations in Indonesia remains to be remote. Victimization of the victims continues.

The 1998 Reform initially gave the hope that Indonesia shall be able to resolve the various past crimes in just manner. That in the new political framework namely democracy the effort to promote and protect human rights could be realized. However, 3 General Elections later, the democracy in Indonesia remains to be procedural in nature. While it is true that the people of Indonesia to some extent enjoy greater civil liberty, but true democracy is not only about civil liberties. The establishment of genuine democracy requires which amongst others rule of law, the submission of military to civil supremacy, as well as the transparency and accountability of the elected government. In all of the aforementioned aspects, the situation remains poor.

Substantively, Indonesia is still far from establishing and upholding human right based democracy.

This deficit in democracy in Indonesia has to be overcome before the state can fulfill its obligation to promote, protect and fulfill the human rights effectively, to its own people and also to victims of human rights violations in Timor Leste.


What should be done while in waiting for such deficit to overturn? It is the obligation of the international community to keep on pushing for justice for the victims of human rights violations in Timor Leste. Accountability for international crimes is the responsibility of all citizens of the world. The commission of international crimes threatens the basic foundations of our collective humanity. This is especially the case when these crimes had been perpetuated not only by the commission of a State Actor, but also by the omission of the International Community.

In the CAVR report, for example, there is a section describing how the Australian government had opted to look the other way when some of these unspeakable atrocities were being committed during the Indonesian occupation. We need to learn from this past and not to repeat this choice of inaction with regards to the pursuance of justice for the victims resulted by such omission.


We are inspired by the struggle of the indigenous peoples in Australia, and those who have worked in solidarity with them, fighting for official acknowledgment and apology from the Australian government. We understand that this was an uphill battle, that the findings and recommendations of an official report on the Stolen Generation was ignored for more than a decade by the government. But the people of Australia, indigenous and non-indigenous together, staged a grassroots movement to say “sorry” acknowledging that the abduction of Aboriginal children from their families was an act of genocide.

This shows that collective and persistent pressure of the people will finally result in change. This type of endeavor and pressure at national as well as international level is also what the victims of human rights violations in East Timor and other places in the world require in order for them to achieve justice. It is what needed to build a bridge to a better future at home and in this interconnected world.


Thus, it is our responsibility, in Indonesia as well as in Australia, to learn more about what took place in Timor-Leste, to read the CAVR and CTF reports, and push our governments, our societies to not wash our hands from what happened in the past. Impunity breeds new violence and new atrocities, as the perpetrators remain unpunished and unrepentant. It is already a grave error to let thousands of victims wait indefinitely for their time for justice, and it is an even atrocious mistake in a civilized community not to exert our utmost endeavour to help them attain it.

To break the impunity and deliver justice to the victims, establishing InternationalTribunal .

This moment is the moment for us to pay our due to the People of Timor Leste, especially the victims, to ensure that at long last, justice and peace walk hand in hand in the land of Timor Leste.

Asmara Nababan
August 29, 2009
Chairman of The Board of Director of DEMOS ( Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Study), Jakarta.

 

CAVR: Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor

 

The Timor-Leste Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation (CAVR – the Portuguese acronym) – was set up in 2001 and functioned from 2002 until its dissolution in December 2005. It was an independent, statutory authority led by seven East Timorese Commissioners and mandated by UNTAET Regulation 2001/10 to undertake truth seeking for the period 1974-1999, facilitate community reconciliation for less serious crimes, and report on its work and findings and make recommendations. Its 2,800 page report entitled ‘Chega!’ was presented to the President, Parliament and Government of Timor-Leste following its completion in October 2005.

 

CTF: Report of the Commission of Truth and Friendship

 The Indonesian-TL report into the violence that occurred during East Timor’s independence vote in 1999. It was released in 2008.

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2010:MEDIA STATEMENT: POLITICAL PARTIES & HUMAN RIGHTS & SOCIAL JUSTICE IN OUR REGION

August 19th, 2010

 

MEDIA STATEMENT: POLITICAL PARTIES & HUMAN RIGHTS & SOCIAL JUSTICE IN OUR REGION

In a joint announcement today, the Australia West Papua Association-SA and the Australia East Timor Friendship Association SA Inc called on Australians to vote for parties that will give a priority to human rights in our region in the forthcoming federal election. 

On 3 August, they sent a list of 5 questions to candidates of the major political parties about what they would be prepared to do about important justice and human rights issues in the Asia Pacific region. The questions were sent to the candidates of the Liberal, Labor, Australian Democrats, the Greens, Family First and Socialist Alliance parties. [The full text of the letter is below].

The questions were as follows:

1. If elected, would you be willing to seek or support a move by the Australian Government to review the oil and gas treaty (CMATS) that exists between Australia and Timor Leste to ensure that the Timorese are given a fair share of the tax revenues from the oil and gas in the Timor Sea?

(Currently, Timor Leste receives less than its entitlement due to an agreement forced on it by the Howard Government. The Rudd and Gillard Governments have not changed this situation).

2. Would you support an Australian Government initiative to obtain justice for the five victims of Balibo and their families?

3. Are you prepared to support the cessation of all cooperation with the TNI (the Indonesian military) and KOPASSUS (the TNI division with the worst history of human rights abuses) until all officers accused of serious violations against human rights have been brought to justice?

4. Would you support the Australian Government raising this issue in the UN, asking all nations to halt all military cooperation with KOPASSUS and the TNI until all the war criminals in their ranks have been brought to justice through an international tribunal?

5. Would you support the Australian Government seeking a UN administered plebiscite in West Papua so that the people can determine their own political future with all TNI personnel removed from the territory beforehand to prevent the carnage and destruction that occurred in Timor Leste in 1999?

The parties that committed to agreeing to support all the actions in the questions were the Socialist Alliance and the Australian Democrats. Both have had a commitment over many years to justice and human rights for those who have suffered repression at the hands of KOPASSUS and the TNI.

While the Greens candidates did not answer all the questions, they do have policies to support changing the scandalous situation whereby Timor Leste receives less than its fair share of the profits from the oil and gas in the Timor Sea and are also committed to supporting the demand by Timor Leste that it have an oil refinery erected on its soil. The Greens have a policy to support self determination for the people of West Papua.

Family First did not answer any questions, but expressed friendship and support for Timor Leste.

The Associations received no response whatsoever from either of Australia’s two major political parties, the Liberal Party and the ALP. It is acknowledged that both parties have supported aid programs to Timor Leste, but remain silent on issues like bringing TNI criminals to justice, changing the scandalous oil and gas agreement with Timor Leste that sees profits that rightly belong to the poorest nation in the region being taken by the wealthiest.

Further, the two major parties have a long history of cooperation with the TNI, refusing to support independence for Timor Leste until 1999 and have refused to support a process for self determination for the people of West Papua. They are both committed to the Lombok Treaty with the Indonesian Republic, which opposes any breakup of the Indonesian Republic even though the TNI is committing gross human rights abuses in West Papua, Acheh and parts of the original Indonesia eg Maluku (the Moluccas).

The two associations in the next few days will disseminate the results of this exercise to its members, members of other human rights groups and the public at large and will urge them to put human rights in the region high on their priority when they vote on election day and give their preferences to the Socialist Alliance, the Australian Democrats and the Greens.

The Committees of both associations urge all Australians to lobby all political parties to ensure that the next parliament will have a greater commitment to international social justice and human rights than has been the case with previous parliaments.

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

Information Officer

Australia East Timor Friendship Association (SA) Inc

Phone: 08 83710480

Email: andyalcock@internode.on.net

Dave Arkins

Secretary Australia West Papua Association (SA) Phone: (08) 83454480 Email: dave-arkins@bigpond.com.au

………………………………………………………………………….

3 August 2010AUSTRALIA EAST TIMOR FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION SA INCPO Box 240 GOODWOOD SA 5034 AUSTRALIA Email: aetfa.sa@gmail.com AUSTRALIA WEST PAPUA ASSOCIATION – SA PO Box 29 KILKENNY SA 5009 AUSTRALIA E-mail: info@awpa-sa.org.au

3 August 2010

Name

Address

Dear

The Australia-East Timor Friendship Association of SA (AETFA) and the Australia West Papua Association SA (AWPA have longstanding concerns over injustices inflicted on

the peoples of Timor Leste and West Papua. We take the opportunity of the forthcoming election to seek the support of prospective members of the Australian Parliament to rectify a number of injustices which should be amenable to any Australian Government committed to human rights. AETFA and AWPA would be greatly encouraged if we could obtain a pledge from parliamentary candidates to seek or support government action on these injustices, should they succeed in being elected. One concern is the inequitable distribution of oil revenue from the Greater Sunrise project in the Timor Sea. Under duress, the Government of Timor Leste has agreed to a treaty with Australia which overrides the entitlement they would normally receive under international maritime law (the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea), and grants them only 50% of tax revenues from Greater Sunrise. Furthermore the Timor Leste Government is bound by the treaty not to seek reconsideration of maritime boundaries for fifty years. We would be greatly encouraged if candidates for the Australian Parliament would give a commitment to seek or support a revisiting of the Treaty on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS Treaty). We also seek the views of parliamentary candidates on achieving justice for the five Australian journalists murdered by the Indonesian military (TNI) in Balibo in 1975. After Australian Governments had repeatedly supported the absurd proposition that all five journalists were killed in crossfire, the facts have been clearly set out in the findings of the NSW coroner that Indonesian Special Forces deliberately killed the five Australian journalists at Balibo in 1975. The coroner recommended that federal authorities consider prosecuting two individuals. Although technically the decision on whether to prosecute lies with the Australian Federal Police (AFP) & the Public Prosecutor; it is virtually certain that the AFP will base any such decision on political advice. It is well documented that the TNI has been responsible for the deaths of at least 183,000 East Timorese between 1975 – 1999, hundreds of thousands of West Papuans since 1962, along with huge numbers of Achehnese and citizens of Indonesia itself since 1965. When the two major parties in this country are putting an emphasis on law and order in Australia, it seems logical that the same principle should apply to the peoples in our region as well, and that Australia should not support governments or organisations that commit genocide and other gross crimes against humanity. Furthermore, it is our belief that Australia should not stay quiet on the issue of seeking

justice for the East Timorese and West Papuan peoples over the multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the TNI and its most abusive element, KOPASSUS.

No senior Indonesian military personnel have ever been prosecuted in stark contrast to war-criminals in Bosnia, Rwanda or Cambodia. An International War Crimes Tribunal has yet to be set up to deal with the crimes by the TNI. Accordingly we would be grateful for your response to the following questions:

1. If elected, would you be willing to seek or support a move by the Australian Government to review the CMATS treaty to ensure that the people of Timor Leste are given a fair share of tax revenues from the oil and gas in the Timor Sea?

2. Would you support an Australian Government initiative to obtain justice for the five victims of Balibo and their families?

3. Are you prepared to support the cessation of all cooperation with the TNI and KOPASSUS until all officers accused of serious violations against human rights have been brought to justice?

4. Would you support the Australian Government raising this issue in the UN, asking all nations to halt all military cooperation with KOPASSUS and the TNI until all the war criminals in their ranks have been brought to justice through an international tribunal?

5. Would you support the Australian Government seeking a UN administered plebiscite in West Papua, with all TNI personnel removed from the territory to prevent the carnage and destruction that occurred in Timor Leste in 1999?

The Committees seek replies to these questions before the elections because we will be sending information to our members and other similar organisations that promote human rights and social justice, advising voters on the response of political parties to these questions. We want to be confident that the next parliament will have a greater commitment to international social justice and human rights than has been the case with previous parliaments.

Yours faithfully

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

Information Officer

Australia East Timor Friendship Association (SA) Inc

Phone: 08 83710480

Email: andyalcock@internode.on.net

Dave Arkins

Secretary Australia West Papua Association (SA)

 Phone: (08) 83454480

Email: dave-arkins@bigpond.com.au

LETTER TO CANDIDATES IN AUSTRALIA’S 2010 FEDERAL ELECTIONS – JUSTICE FOR WEST PAPUA & EAST TIMOR

August 5th, 2010

 

AUSTRALIA EAST TIMOR FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION SA INC
PO Box 240
GOODWOOD SA 5034 AUSTRALIA
Email:    aetfa.sa@gmail.com

AUSTRALIA WEST PAPUA ASSOCIATION – SA
PO Box 29
KILKENNY SA 5009 AUSTRALIA
E-mail:  info@awpa-sa.org.au

3 August 2010

Ms Kate Ellis

161a Main North Road
NAILSWORTH SA 5083


Email: Kate.Ellis.MP@aph.gov.au

Dear Ms Ellis

                                                                                    & EAST 

LETTER TO CANDIDATES – JUSTICE FOR WEST PAPUA & EAST TIMOR

The Australia-East Timor Friendship Association of SA (AETFA) and the  Australia West Papua Association SA (AWPA have longstanding concerns over  injustices inflicted on the peoples of Timor Leste and West Papua.

We take the opportunity of the forthcoming election to seek the support of prospective members of the Australian Parliament to rectify a number of  injustices which should be amenable to any Australian Government committed to human rights.

AETFA and AWPA would be greatly encouraged if we could obtain a pledge from  parliamentary candidates to seek or support government action on these  injustices, should they succeed in being elected.

One concern is the inequitable distribution of oil revenue from the Greater  Sunrise project in the Timor Sea.  Under duress, the Government of Timor  Leste has agreed to a treaty with Australia which overrides the entitlement they would normally receive under international maritime law (the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea), and  grants them only 50% of tax revenues from Greater Sunrise. Furthermore the Timor Leste Government is bound by the  treaty not to seek reconsideration of maritime boundaries for fifty years.

We would be greatly encouraged if candidates for the Australian Parliament  would give a commitment to seek or support a revisiting of the Treaty on  Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS Treaty).

We also seek the views of parliamentary candidates on achieving justice for  the five Australian journalists murdered by the Indonesian military (TNI) in  Balibo in 1975.  After Australian Governments had repeatedly supported the  absurd proposition that all five journalists were killed in crossfire, the facts have been clearly set out in the findings of the NSW coroner that  Indonesian Special Forces deliberately killed the five Australian
journalists at Balibo in 1975.

The coroner recommended that federal authorities consider prosecuting two individuals. Although technically the decision on whether to prosecute lies with the Australian Federal Police (AFP) & the Public Prosecutor; it is virtually certain that the AFP will base any such decision on political  advice.

It is well documented that the TNI has been responsible for the deaths of at  least 183,000 East Timorese between 1975 – 1999, hundreds of thousands of  West Papuans since 1962, along with huge numbers of Achehnese and citizens of Indonesia itself since 1965.

When the two major parties in this country are putting an emphasis on law  and order in Australia, it seems logical that the same principle should  apply to the peoples in our region as well,  and that Australia should not
support governments or organisations that commit genocide and other gross crimes against humanity.

Furthermore, it is our belief that Australia should not stay quiet on the issue of seeking justice for the East Timorese and West Papuan peoples over the multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the TNI and its most abusive element, KOPASSUS.

No senior Indonesian military personnel have ever been prosecuted in stark  contrast to war-criminals in Bosnia, Rwanda or Cambodia. An International  War Crimes Tribunal has yet to be set up to deal with the crimes by the TNI.

Accordingly we would be grateful for your response to the following questions:

 1.      If elected, would you be willing to seek or support a move by the Australian  Government to  review the CMATS treaty  to ensure that the people of Timor Leste are given a fair share of tax revenues from the oil and gas in the Timor Sea?

 2.       Would you support an Australian Government initiative to obtain justice for the five  victims of Balibo and their families?

3.      Are you prepared to support the cessation of all cooperation with the TNI  and   KOPASSUS until all officers accused of serious violations against human rights have been brought to justice?

4.     Would you support the Australian Government raising this issue in the UN, asking  all nations to halt all military cooperation with KOPASSUS and the TNI until all   the  war criminals in their ranks have been  brought to justice through an international tribunal?

5.     Would you support the Australian Government seeking a UN administered plebiscite in West Papua, with all TNI personnel removed from the territory to  prevent  the carnage and destruction that occurred in Timor Leste in 1999?

The Committees seek replies to these questions before the elections because  we will be sending information to our members and other similar organisations that promote human rights and social justice, advising voters  on the response of political parties to these questions.

We want to be confident that the next parliament will have a greater  commitment to international social justice and human rights than has been the case with previous parliaments.

Yours faithfully

Andrew (Andy) Alcock
Information Officer
Australia East Timor Friendship Association (SA) Inc

Phone:    08 83710480
Email:    andyalcock@internode.on.net

Dave Arkins

Secretary

Australia West Papua Association (SA)

Phone:    (08) 83454480

Email:    dave-arkins@bigpond.com.au

YUDHOYONO RECEIVES AN AUSTRALIAN HONOUR – THE EAST TIMORESE RECEIVE NOTHING! 

March 10th, 2010

 

 

 AUSTRALIA EAST TIMOR FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION

SOUTH AUSTRALIA  INC

                                        (AETFA SA INC)

MEDIA STATEMENT:     10 MARCH 2010

 

YUDHOYONO RECEIVES AN AUSTRALIAN HONOUR

  • THE EAST TIMORESE RECEIVE NOTHING

Australian human rights activists are outraged that the Australian Government has bestowed Australia’s highest civilian honour, the Honorary Companion of the Order of Australia, on Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono during a ceremony at Government House, Canberra. The award was made in recognition of Dr Yudhoyono’s work in strengthening Australia-Indonesia relations, in promoting democracy and development in Indonesia. The official citation said he had been “steadfast and humane” in the face of terrorist attacks, while also working with Australia through regional groups such as APEC and the East Asia Summit.

 

For some time, many Australians have called on the Australian Government to give the same award to the people of Timor Leste for the sacrifices they made in assisting Australia during World War 2. A campaign organised by Sister Susan Connolly of the Mary MacKillop East Timor Mission had gathered 24,000 signatures from Australians who are grateful for East Timor’s World War 2 support. Australians are also well aware  of the shameful betrayal of the Timorese by successive Australian governments when they were illegally occupied by the Indonesian Army (TNI) between 1975 – 1999.

 

 The presentation of an award to East Timor has also been supported by the South Australian Parliament after a motion supporting this initiative by by an independent member of SA’s Legislative Council, David Winderlich.

 

Since these moves, the Australian Government has told campaigners that the award was only for individuals.

 

Those supporting East Timor receiving the award cited the case of Britain awarding the George Cross to the people of Malta for enduring massive German air raids against their island around the clock in an attempt to neutralise the British bases in Malta.The George Cross had been instituted by King George VI on 24 September 1940 as the civilian equivalent to the Victoria Cross. The award is intended mainly for civilians is awarded only for acts of the greatest heroism or the most conspicuous courage in circumstances of extreme danger. This award was made by King George VI to the Governor of Malta on 15 April 1942:

“To honour her brave people I award the George Cross to the Island Fortress of Malta to bear witness to a heroism and devotion that will long be famous in history.”, (signed) George R.I.

The East Timorese paid a heavy price because of their support for Australian soldiers during World War 2. After the Australians left Timor, Japanese soldiers entered village after village, lined up civilians and mowed them down with machine gun fire in reprisal. At least 40,000 civilians lost their lives from these actions. Some believe that another 30,000 East Timorese died because of air raids on their villages or because they were caught between opposing forces.

The population of Portuguese Timor at the time was approximately 500,000, making this loss of life a very heavy sacrifice. The  Mary MacKillop East Timor Mission on its website syas this about the sacrifice of the East Timorese:

“It need not have been that way. The East Timorese could have handed the Australians over to the Japanese, as the West Timorese did within days. As true allies, the East Timorese people suffered grievously during 1942 and for the rest of the War. Any acknowledgement of their role in World War II must be worthy of the facts”.

While it is true that President Yuhono has done much to democratise the Republic of Indonesia after 33 years of the Suharto dictatorship, he has done very little to deal with the war criminals in the ranks of the TNI who have committed gross crimes against humanity in West Papua, East Timor, Acheh and many parts of Indonesia itself. It is inappropriate to bestow such an honour on President Yudhoyono until he has taken steps to deal with those alleged to have committed these crimes and to withdraw the TNI from West Papua and to allow its people to determine their own political future.

 

It is acknowledged that Indonesians have faced many threats from terrorist attacks, but it must be said that these attacks were far less severe than the attacks suffered by the peoples of East Timor and Malta during World War 2 and more recently by the people East Timor at the hands of the Indonesian dictatorship.

 

It is obvious that the award was given to President Yudhoyono to soften him up before talks between Australia and Indonesia about the issue of boat people coming into

the SE Asian region.

 

Mr James Dunn AO, the former Australian Consul to Portuguese Timor and author of the books Timor: A People Betrayed and Timor: A People Betrayed and East Timor - a rough passage to independence had this to say about the award to the Indonesian President:

 

“As a member of the order, I have some concerns about this award. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyo  does deserve some acknowledgement of his efforts to democratise Indonesia, but in relation to East Timor, he also participated in the occupation, in 1982 or 1983 commanding one of the battalions with a less than savoury reputation. To his credit, he is a Kostrad officer, and not from Kopassus and some time ago, events in ET obviously troubled him, causing him to speak out at an Indonesian university, where I too, was a speaker. His past in ET is not too bad, but he does have a mark against him. Also, as I understand it, as a lieutenant, he took part in the brutal invasion of Dili on 7 December 1975.

 

As a general comment, surely it would be better for our government to have a separate order to be bestowed on distinguished foreigners. The use of the Order of Australia is inevitablly largely a political act. It will be remembered that Ali Alatas, who gave strong support to Indonesia’s occupation of East Timor when serious atrocities were taking place, was also awarded the AO. As far as I can recall his main act of  friendship was to collaborate in that ignominious Timor Gap agreement“.

 

Let us not forget the terrible suffering of the Timorese at the hands of Imperial Japan during WW2 and the TNI between 1975 – 19999, during which time, successive Australian governments openly aided and abetted the aggressor. This makes it all the more compelling that the Australian Government should now award the people of East Timor with an honour that gives full recognition and acknowledgement to their suffering during World War 2 for supporting Australia against Imperial Japan

 

 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

 

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

Information Officer

AETFA SA Inc

 

51 Leah St, Forestville SA 5035

 

Phone:    08 83710480       

                  0457 827 014 

 

Email:      andyalcock@internode.on.net

 

AETFA:

PO Box 240

GOODWOOD SA 5034
AUSTRALIA

 

Website:    http://www.aetfa.org.au/

 

Email:         aetfa.sa@gmail.com

By Phone:
Mark Rohde (Secretary and Web): 0422 968 531 / +61 422 968 531
Rosemary McKay (Chairperson)
Bob Hanney (Newsletter): 08 8344 3511 / +618 8344 3511
Andy Alcock (Information Officer): 0457 827 014 / +61 08 83710480       

Letter to the Editor – The Age – Uninvited Guests

November 12th, 2009

So Indonesian military spokesperson Rear-Marshall Sagom Tamboen is upset that the Oceanic Viking is an uninvited guest that is harming Indonesian sovereignty and causing the Indonesian military (TNI) to do unplanned work (TA 11.11.2009).

The peoples of East Timor and West Papua know all about uninvited guests and the planned work that the TNI is famous for - genocide and massive human rights abuses.

Comments on Asia Pacific Focus Program (ABC TV) 27.9.09

September 27th, 2009

I want to congratulate Jim Middleton & the Asia Pacific Focus program for its report on West Papua on 27.9.09.

It is time that leaders who claim to value human rights demand that the Indonesian military (TNI) is withdrawn from the country and allow a UN supervised independence referendum with the presence of an international peace keeping force unlike the 1999 referendum in Timor Leste, which led to another wave of death and destruction that we have come to expect from the TNI.

The West Papuans have suffered terrorism at the hands of the TNI ever since it marched into their country in 1962.

Our leaders should also be calling for Indonesia to hand over the war criminals in its ranks to be tried by an international tribunal as happened in Yugoslavia and Rwanda.

The TNI crimes against humanity have occurred in West Papua, East Timor, Acheh and parts of Indonesia itself. It has members aligned with other terrorist organisations. All military assistance to Indonesia should cease until it leaves West Papua, hands over the war criminals and pays reparations to those who have suffered from the crimes committed by the TNI in West Papua, East Timor and Acheh.

Like East Timor, West Papua will be free, but to delay action against the TNI will only mean mopre death, suffering and destruction in our region.

Thank you again for a great program.

Letter to the Editor – The Independent Weekly – Human Rights & Independence for West Papua

August 22nd, 2009

Thank you for printing the article “Isolated rebels fight on” (TIW 21 – 27.8.09) about the grim situation in West Papua.

The reason why the West Papuan just struggle is a forgotten war is that the Indonesian military (TNI) has virtually closed the place off from the outside world; just as it did in East Timor for most of the 24 years it occupied that country. Another reason is that the western backers of the Indonesian government do not want to upset the Indonesian government as there is money to be made out of West Papua’s resources for big corporations.

If Australians fly to Jakarta, they can apply for a visa when they arrive and have it issued on the spot. We know what happens to those who fly to Jayapura (Hollandia), the capital of West Papua and expect the same treatment!. They will be detained just a group of Australians was this year. The TNI does not want prying eyes to see how they treat peoples they repress.

Recently,  Indonesian President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, called on Indonesians to help stamp out terrorism in the Republic. It seems to me that if he is sincere about this, he needs to answer several searching questions.

What  was he saying and doing about the terrorism and genocide committed by the Indonesian military in East Timor, West Papua and Acheh while he was one of its senior generals?

Does his statement mean that he will bring to trial those TNI officers suspected of war crimes and human rights abuses in the past including those who have links with terrorist groups?

If he considers that West Papua is truly part of the Indonesian Republic, will he spare its people further bloodshed and suffering by withdrawing  the terrorist TNI and allowing the people to have a properly conducted referendum, unlike the the brutal farce of 1968; the so-called Act of Free Choice or the free choice to say yes to integration or be shot? This needs to happen so that West Papuans can have a peaceful future?

Frequently, the TNI complains about certain organisations like the OPM in West Papua and GAM in Acheh as being threats to Indonesia’s national security as well as being ungrateful to the Indonesian Republic. The fact is that it is the corrupt and brutal behaviour of the TNI that has led to the formation of many independence groups in the region.

The TNI has to be seen as one of the major reasons for the political instability in the archipelago.  Those who have recently seen the film Balibo would appreciate this fact.

To bring peace and security to our region, the world community needs to stop all military cooperation with the TNI and put pressure on the Indonesian government to deal with the war criminals in its ranks. Indonesia cannot claim to be a democratic country until the TNI is subservient to the country’s elected government, the human rights violators in the TNI have faced justice and the huge amounts of money it has amassed through extortion, mass murder and corruption are spent on assisting the victims of its terrorism.