You are currently browsing the archives for the Uncategorized category.

CLIMATE DISASTER FUND

January 31st, 2011

 CLIMATE DISASTER FUND – Rapid response needed

   Dear Friends   

 The Gillard Government is coming in for some stick over the levy it wants to impose to raise funds for flood victims in Australia.   There are always many generous Australians who open their hearts and pockets to help provide humanitarian aid in places where disasters occur.

Generally, this is to be encouraged. While the money being paid might not be much, we could also look at other ways of providing such funds without hitting the pockets of little people.  

I have written a letter to an Adelaide on line news service suggesting that the government withdraws our troops from the US war in Afghanistan as it will save heaps of dollars that could pay for much of the relief.  

Another idea, of course, is to make those responsible for contributing to the recent flood disaster to provide the bulk of these funds.   Then Get Up sent an email urging recipients to sign a petition demanding that the government stop paying out billions of dollars to subsidise the use of fossil fuels – the very substances causing climate change and also polluting our environment with carcinogens and other dangerous chemicals.  

 I would urge you to sign the Get Up petition and discuss the issues arising from it with fellow workers, friends and family members.  

A Comparison: Remember that the GST (the Goods & Services Tax)?

This was an extra tax foisted on everybody by the Howard Government to raise more revenue. By doing this, it forced many millionaires and billionaires, many of whom had never paid any tax at all, to at least pay some. However, it was just another impost on ordinary people. We got a situation where some very wealthy people were paying tax at the same amount as low PAYE (Pay as You Earn) workers were paying in their GST (on top of the tax on their wages)   New taxation laws could have been introduced to raise more revenue from the wealthy.

Politicians are loathe to do this because it will get the wealthy and greedy off side who don’t want to pay tax at all.  Remember the reaction the federal government got in 2010 when it tried to implement a tax on the super profits of the big mining corporations??? The mining companies and conservative commentators went beserk!  

We should also remember that many of these same people want us to fight US wars (eg Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan etc) to help expand their profit-making potential . Those of us who remember the US war in Vietnam might remember the slogan condemning Australian involvement in this highly immoral war: War is good business. Invest our children!   Please sign the Get Up petition and urge the polluters to pay and for the big profiteers to pay their fair share of tax.  

In solidarity  

Andy Alcock    

GET UP CLIMATE DISASTER FUND PETITION  

48 hours ago, the Government announced they want to pay for the climate disasters of today by killing the renewable energy projects of tomorrow.

Climate change means more extreme weather events1, so it makes sense to establish a permanent Climate Disaster Fund — not just to respond to one off events like the recent floods.

There’s a simple solution to fund reconstruction after extreme weather events, while also reducing pollution and supporting renewable energy. The Government must establish a permanent Climate Disaster Fund, paid for by ending the billions of dollars they’re handing out to subsidise the use of fossil fuels2, most of which ends up in the pockets of Australia’s biggest polluters.

Click here to sign the petition

The three Independents in the lower house all support a permanent natural disaster fund. The Government will have to negotiate with them to get its flood levy through, so we have a real chance to preserve the renewable energy programs the Government wants to cut and to set up a permanent disaster recovery fund paid for by ending polluter handouts. To save these renewable energy programs we need an immediate public outcry – please add your voice now.

Call on Prime Minister Gillard to pay for flood recovery by cutting fossil fuel handouts, not renewable energy

http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/ClimateDisasterFund

Around the world, governments are realising the irresponsibility of subsidising polluting energy while their citizens suffer from the impacts of climate change. Three days ago in his State of the Union speech US President Barack Obama announced an end to billions in taxpayer subsidies to oil, gas and other fossil fuel producers. He pledged to use the money to fund clean energy instead.

The Australian Government promised to end our own polluter subsidies at the G20 summit back in 20093, but continues to give these industries around $10 billion a year – that’s over $800 from every Australian taxpayer. Given the need to set up a permanent climate disaster fund and respond to the realities of dangerous climate change, it’s impossible for them to justify continuing to spend it on tax breaks for coal, oil and gas.

Together, let’s end this policy madness.

Thank you for speaking out,
The GetUp Team

PS – Reducing fossil fuel subsidies can do more than help pay for the Queensland flood recovery. We can use the savings to fund an ongoing climate disaster fund to address the damage from future extreme weather events. Other countries have similar schemes, including the United States, New Zealand and Japan. It means future disasters won’t require a levy or cuts to essential programs. Click here to help save renewable energy programs and support a long-term climate disaster fund.

Sources:
1 Hennessy et al., ‘Australia and New Zealand’ in Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 507-540, 2007.
2 Institute for Sustainable Futures, ‘Energy and Transport Subsidies in Australia’, 55-58, 2007.
3 ‘G20 Leaders’ statement: The Pittsburgh Summit’, 24-25 September, 2009.
GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! If you have trouble with any links in this email, please go directly to www.getup.org.au. To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here.

Authorised by Simon Sheikh, Level 5, 116 Kippax St, Surry Hills NSW 2010

 

  —– Original Message —– From: andyalcock To: indaily@solsticemedia.com.au Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 2:25 AM Subject: PM GILLARD: “NO PILE OF MONEY FOR FLOOD ASSISTANCE”

Mr Des Ryan

Editor

InDaily

4 Cinema Place(off Vaughan Place)
ADELAIDE SA 5000

indaily@solsticemedia.com.au  

Dear Mr Ryan  

RE:    PM GILLARD:    “NO PILE OF MONEY FOR FLOOD ASSISTANCE”   

I was interested to note the statement by the PM, Julia Gillard, that there is no large reserve available to the federal government   to assist flood victims (In Daily 28.1.2011).  

This is presumably the reason why she is introducing a levy to find the money.

Already, we are seeing that many Australians, especially those who have made generous donations to the flood appeal, are outraged.   I would suggest that one way to find the money would be for Australia to stop supporting the US war in Afghanistan. By doing this, Australia would save billions of dollars that could be used to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by the recent floods and to assist the victims and there would be no need for the levy to be imposed.  

If she was to do this, the PM might find that her government might actually regain some popularity. Most Australians would be happy because a very unpopular tax could be avoided and there would be no more Australian casualties from this war.    

Yours sincerely  

Andrew (Andy) Alcock   


YOUR RIGHTS ON TRIAL RALLY – 8.30 AM WEDNESDAY 24.11.2010 , VICTORIA SQUARE, ADELAIDE – SUPPORT ARK TRIBE/ABOLISH THE ABCC/DEMAND EFFECTIVE NATIONAL OHS&W LAWS / ASBESTOS MEMORIAL DAY 26.11.2010

November 22nd, 2010

 
  RALLY TO:   

 *    SUPPORT ARK TRIBE  

*    CALL FOR THE CLOSURE OF THE ABCC  

*    DEMAND EFFECTIVE NATIONAL OHS&W LAWS

 time:        8.30 am

day:         Wednesday

date:        24 November   2010

venue:    Victoria Square, Adelaide

This rally is being held on the day that Ark receives the verdict of the court.

Be there to show your support!

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

ASBESTOS VICTIMS MEMORIAL DAY SERVICES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….   Asbestos Disease Society of SA Inc’s ceremony:  time:             7.30 – 9am    day:             Friday

date:           November 26th 2010

venue:        Jack Watkins Memorial Park                     Churchill Rd Bus (Stop 19)                     Kilburn                                                  Breakfast will be provided by SA Unions and there will be a Memorial Balloon Launch at  8 am  followed by speakers etc                                         …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….     Asbestos Victims Association ceremony:time:     10:30 am to 11:30 am

day:      Friday

date:     26th November  2010

venue:   Pitman Park SALISBURY

                                (adjacent to the main Salisbury shopping centre)ARK TRIBE

Ark Tribe is a South Australian construction worker who is facing 6 months jail for attending a safety meeting on site and refusing to dob in his workmates when instructed by the Australian Building Construction Commission (ABCC) to attend their inquisition. The ABCC was established by John Howard to put pressure on construction workers on behalf of construction companies. Deputy PM Julia Gillard promised to close down the ABCC, but has not done so.

Other workers do not face such draconian laws when they are working to improve health & safety on the job. As a construction worker Ark Tribe has no right to remain silent about what was discussed by his fellow workers at a meeting to discuss OHS&W; he was expected to incriminate himself and his workmates because this unfair and archaic law says he must.

There has been no suggestion or indication from the employers, the ABCC, or those prosecuting that Ark Tribe was involved in any activity which breached any law nor has he been charged with any breaches of the law other than the accusation that he failed to attend an ABCC inquisition.

No one should be jailed or threatened jail because they believe it is a basic human right of all workers in a democratic country to demand that their OHS&W laws are of the highest standard & that they have the right to remain silent about union meetings they attend to achieve this aim.

Are bosses forced by law to reveal details of meetings where they discuss OHS&W or the watering down of OHS&W???

Be there and let Ark know you care.

DON’T RISK 2ND RATE OH&S LAWS (an ACTU CAMPAIGN)

The Australian federal government is in the process of standardising Australia’s OH&S laws. When it started this process, Deputy PM Julia Gillard promised Australian unions that the government would ensure that it would result in the highest standard laws. However, instead of giving us best practice and effective laws, the Rudd government wants to water down the laws we have in each state. It is time to take a stand to demand that our OHS&W laws are the best they possibly can be - especially as about 8000 Australian workers die from work-related accidents and disease every year.

It is totally unacceptable that a Labor government, which is supposed to be looking after workers should be responsible for undermining our health, safety and welfare by giving us second rate laws.

Support the ACTU Don’t Risk @nd Rate Safety Laws Campaign.

* THE UN CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS SAYS THAT OH&S IS A BASIC HUMAN   RIGHT

* DON’T RISK 2ND RATE HEALTH & SAFETY LAWS

* YOUR OH&S RIGHTS AT WORK ARE WORTH FIGHTING FOR TOO

* SUPPORT THE ACTU UNION CHARTER OF WORKPLACE RIGHTS FOR OH&S &  WORKERS’   COMPENSATION

* ABOLISH THE ABCC & LET ARK GO FREE

 For further information about the Ark Tribe campaign, visit: http://www.rightsonsite.org.au/

Adelaide Office of the CFMEU
Level 1,  32 South Terrace
Adelaide 5000
Phone:     08 8231 5532

For further information about the ACTU Don’t Risk 2nd Rate Safety Laws campaign, visit:

http://www.actu.asn.au/Campaigns/HealthSafety/default.aspx

For further information about the ACTU UNION CHARTER OF WORKPLACE RIGHTS FOR OH&S &  WORKERS’ COMPENSATION visit: http://www.actu.asn,au/Campaigns/HealthSafety/News/UnionCharterofWorkplaceRightsforOHSandWorkersCompensatiionPetition.aspx

Show the Charter to your local MP & ask him or her to commit to the principles contained in it

SA Unions
46 Greenhill Road,
Wayville SA 5034
Telephone:     (08) 8279 2222
Facsimile:        (08) 8279 2223

Email:             saunions@saunions.org.au

ACTU 

Level 6/365 Queen Street
Melbourne

Vic 3000
Australia
Telephone:    1300 362 223 (local call cost)
Telephone:     (03) 9664 7333
Facsimile:       (03) 9600 0050

posted by Andy Alcock 

THE CASE FOR MORE HUMANE TREATMENT OF ASYLUM SEEKERS BY AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS – Fatima Erfani: why did she die?

November 13th, 2010

Fatima Erfani: why did she die?

This is a page dedicated to Fatima Erfani, a 28-year old mother of three, who died as a result of what we see as medical neglect, compounded by extreme stress, and isolation on Christmas Island as a result of the abhorrent Australian asylum seeker policies.

The page is a collection of writings, most of them unpublished, by people who have been touched by the events surrounding Fatima’s death. It starts with our Media release, which revealed more facts that the Minister of Immigration liked us to know or become aware of. We owe thanks to the person(s) who shared that information with us for our media release.

Murder by Negligence: Australian Government Responsible

Media Release
Project SafeCom Inc.
January 31, 2003

Fatima came to Australia from Afghanistan on a boat [named SIEV-6 by the Australian people-smuggler deterrence troups, Operation Relex - see photo] from Indonesia in October 2001, during the federal election campaign and post Tampa and the September 11 terrorist attacks. By the time they arrived at Christmas Island, the Liberal Government had excised Christmas Island from Australia for the purposes of the Migration Act. This meant that Fatima and her family had little or no opportunity for making a new life in Australia. She travelled with her husband, Ali Reza and her three children aged 7, 6 and 3. The family are Hazara and had been persecuted by the Taliban.

During 2002, possibly in June, Fatima was diagnosed with and treated for high blood pressure. According to her husband, her blood pressure worsened during the year especially after the detention centre fire in November, and after their claims for asylum had been rejected making the reality of a return to war-torn Afghanistan inevitable.

On Saturday 11 January 2003, Fatima awoke during the night with severe headaches. She took panadol. She had headaches during Sunday and Monday and generally felt unwell. Her blood pressure was taken sometime during this time and the reading was 220 over 120. On Tuesday 14 January 2003, Fatima went to see a Doctor at the Christmas Island hospital to see about her headaches and blood pressure. She was given medication to treat her headaches and reassured that she was OK. On Wednesday 15 January, Fatima was very unwell all morning. She had difficulty getting out of bed and staying awake, and was unable to walk very small distances. At 11.30am she collapsed and was unconscious. She was taken to Christmas Island hospital.

It took until 11pm to get a plane to Christmas Island for Fatima to be evacuated to Perth. At 3.30am on 16 January Fatima arrived at SCGH. A brain scan was conducted immediately and the Doctor told Ali Reza that unless surgery occurred, Fatima would die within 24 hours. Ali Reza consented to surgery. At 8.30am he was told that Fatima’s brain was too damaged and the bleeding in her brain was too extensive, and that she had very little time to live.

During Thursday Fatima was unconscious in the intensive care unit at SCGH with Ali Reza by her side. In the early afternoon I tried to see Ali Reza to offer some support and also to say goodbye to Fatima whom I had known for nearly 12 months. I was stopped at the doors of ICU by and ACM guard and told to phone a DIMIA official in Canberra to seek permission. I spent the next 10 minutes trying to find a public phone to make the call to Canberra, becoming more distressed and frustrated each minute. I explained that I did not want to intrude and that I would only stay for 5 minutes. My main aim was to let Ali know I was there and that he could telephone me if he wanted to. The DIMIA official was unequivocal in her refusal of allowing me to visit and assured me that Ali was getting all the support he needed. I stressed that I was the only person in Perth he knew, that I had known him, Fatima and their children for nearly a year, and that under the circumstances he may appreciate seeing my face. The DIMIA position had been set in concrete and it was clear I was not able to visit Ali and Fatima. I stumbled out of the hospital crying with rage and frustration and not being able to comprehend the indignity and inhumanity of our government’s position.

On Friday 17 January, Ali Reza was told that Fatima’s brain was dead and ask whether he consented to the life support system being turned off. He said he would wait until her heart had stopped beating. Fatima’s heart stopped beating on Sunday 19 January.

Ali Reza and Fatima’s children were sent to Perth from Christmas Island on Friday 17 January, pressumably to say goodbye to their mother. They were accomodated in a hotel with an ACM guard while their mother was dying in hospital. After Fatima died, Ali was told that he and the children were to return to Christmas Island the next day.

I have been speaking with Ali Reza every night by telephone. He told me that on the Friday he was by Fatima’s ICU bed, he was told by the ACM guard that I was there outside ICU, but that he was forbidden to go outside to speak to me. He said he wanted me to be with him and Fatima, and when they forbade him to see me, his heart became so swollen he felt it would burst through his mouth. He still doesn’t know what has happened to Fatima’s body.

ALP’s Carmen Lawrence on Fatima

Address at the ACT Labor Club
by Dr Camen Lawrence
Federal ALP member for Fremantle
20 February 2003

where is Christmas Island? It’s a very long way from the mainland. Are the media going to be there, watching what’s happening on Christmas Island? Will they report when things go wrong, things like the fires that destroyed much of the existing facilities; events like the death a couple of weeks ago of a young Afghani mother of three, Fatima Erfani, had a brain haemorrhage and died after being transferred to a hospital in Perth.

Let me tell you a little of her story, one the government did not make public until the story was leaked by friends of Fatima and Ali Reza. The family were sent to Christmas Island, post Tampa.

Fatima had been treated for high blood pressure for about seven months before her death on Sunday 18 January. The week before her death she suffered terrible headaches and was given Panadol after seeing a nurse in the detention centre who took her blood pressure and recorded a level of 220/120, which is very high. A consistent blood pressure reading of 140/90 mm Hg or higher is considered high blood pressure, which increases the risk for heart disease and stroke. Careful monitoring and management are always recommended. At this time she was also under added stress because she and her husband were being pressured to sign documents agreeing to return to Afghanistan. They eventually did sign them, because they were very worried that they would be sent to Nauru, about which they had heard very bad reports.

When the headaches persisted, Fatima was taken to see a doctor in the hospital who gave her stronger pain medication for her headaches only. Ali Reza, who acted as interpreter (there are none on the Island), said he couldn’t make the doctor understand that she was really unwell. Fatima was sent back to the detention centre and the next morning could barely wake and was very groggy. At 11.30 am, she collapsed into unconsciousness and was taken to the hospital. Twelve hours later she was placed on a flight to Perth and was operated on at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital at 3.30 am after a brain scan revealed severe haemorrhaging.

After such a delay, the operation was not successful and she remained unconscious until her death. While her husband and children had been brought to Perth, they were sent back to Christmas Island the next morning.

After hearing this story, I wrote letter to Ruddock demanding an inquiry and urging that the records be secured, because records have gone missing in other coronial inquires. I have also asked the Minister’s office a series of questions about what has happened to Fatima’s body. When I last inquired, her husband is still unaware of where his wife’s body is and what the Department plans to do.

From an address at the ACT Labor Club, February 20 2003. Posted at our website here.

Family pays price of our compassion

The West Australian
METRO Edition
by Andre Malan
Thursday 30 January 2003

BY THE definition of Immigration Minister Phillip Ruddock and his bureaucrats, Ali and Fatima Reza and their three small children were queue jumpers.

They came to Australia uninvited and dared to hope that they would be able to make a new life for themselves here away from the fear that had become their daily experience in Afghanistan.

The terrible thing that has since happened to the young family will probably help to discourage others from following in their footsteps. But it should also awaken Australians to the human costs of our policies on asylum seekers.

Ali, Fatima and the three children, Zainab, now three, her sister Zahara, 6, and brother Haider Ali, 7, left their home in an Afghani village in the middle of 2001. As members of the Hazari minority denounced as heretics by the Taliban because they were Shi’ite rather than Sunni Muslims, they had experienced frequent violent harassment.

Some members of their extended family were killed, or just disappeared.

The prospects of ever being able to migrate legitimately were non-existent. But they were desperate, and they judged that their grim circumstances would qualify them as refugees.

So, with the help of others in their village the Rezas scraped together about $24,000 and followed a well-trodden path across the border into Pakistan, where they were found, as they were told they would be, by people smugglers.

In return for their money they were flown to Malaysia, where they were able to enter without visas, and were escorted to Indonesia to await a boat that would take them to Australia.

By the time their boat was intercepted and boarded by the Royal Australian Navy, we had already been through the Tampa saga, and Christmas Island, where they were taken, had been excluded from Australia for asylum purposes.

Deprived of the opportunity to apply for a temporary protection visa, the Rezas took the only step available to them. They applied for political asylum and waited in detention on Christmas Island for their future to be decided.

Their application failed, as did their only avenue of appeal to the immigration authorities. The ambiguous status of Christmas Island meant that they did not have access to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal.

The Rezas considered accepting the Federal Government’s offer of $2000 per family member as an incentive to return to Afghanistan. But they had no home, family or other support to return to.

To complicate things further, they feared that if they refused the cash offer they would be transferred to Nauru, where life was even bleaker. Raising three small children is demanding enough at the best of times. When you are living in a detention centre and your future is uncertain it must be hell. The strain began to tell on 29-year-old Fatima, and although she had not previously had any health problems, her blood pressure shot up to an extreme 220/120.

She was treated on the island for her hypertension and severe headaches, but collapsed and went into a coma and had to be flown to a hospital in Perth. Ali, 29, came with her, but had to leave the children on the island.

In Perth, Fatima had surgery to relieve a brain haemorrhage, but she died on January 19.

The following day Mr Reza was told that he had to go back to Christmas Island. We can only imagine the distress he and his children are going through.

Unfortunately their unhappiness has been made worse by the fact that Fatima’s body is still lying in the hospital morgue 10 days after she died. It is important to Muslims that bodies should be buried within 24 hours of death.

People who know them describe the Rezas as an intelligent family with high standards who would have made good migrants. Their biggest mistake was that they sought compassion in the wrong country at the wrong time.

Fatima’s Wish

A dedication to Fatima Erfani, who died in Perth’s Sir Charles Gardner hospital on Sunday 19 January 2003.

by Richard Wood
Teacher, Christmas Island

“We’re going to Christmas”. With that proclamation my wife accepted a job on Christmas Island and I finished my thirty-five years in Victorian schools. “Stay in your job and it will kill you.” – “You care too much”, she added for good measure.

Interested friends and acquaintances would ask what would I find to do there. “Isn’t it every man’s dream to be kept by a woman on a tropical island?” was my glib answer. I’d add “beautiful woman”, if my wife was in earshot.

So began our two years on Christmas, an idyllic island, 350 kilometres from the Javanese coast.

The arrival of the Tampa and the subsequent construction of a detention centre on the Island to house asylum seekers shattered my reverie as a kept bloke.

My offer of volunteer work teaching the detainees led to full time employment at the centre. Friends opposed to detention centres were a little dubious about my new teaching duties. I rationalised my role by claiming the moral high ground as a teacher providing a service and some pleasure under difficult circumstances. “Just like a prostitute really”, as one friend said over drinks, “only the pay’s a little less”.

On my first day of teaching I stood outside the main gate of the detention centre. They are forbidding places. Forlorn and abrasive, full of galvanised steel and mesh. The razor wire demands your attention.

Inside where the detainees live was a different story. There was warmth and good humour from the mainly Sri Lankan men and the small contingent of Afghani and Iraqi families.

I enjoyed teaching these people: they were my students. The motivation and pleasure in their learning of English rekindled my love of teaching.

Both they and I, always looked forward to the next session. There were gales of laughter during role-plays. Their favourite English conversation activity was played out between the ‘immigration manager’ and the ‘visa applicant’.

The ‘immigration manager’ would always end this drama with a warm approval of the visa application followed by a round of gleeful applause from the audience.

I taught the Iraqi and Afghan women each morning. We would do this in their dormitory away from the gaze of the other detainees and ACM staff. Some of the ladies spoke Arabic whilst others spoke Farsi, so their halting English was their means of conversing with one another.

Some shared the lesson with their babies, fussing over them as they pursued their studies with pride. The proudest moment for me came when a young Afghani mother, married at 14 and celebrating her 21st birthday in detention, moved from not being able to recognise a letter of the English alphabet, to writing and reading English.

Her enthusiasm for learning humbled my teaching skills. Her pride in her achievement will stay with me forever.

Within this group of four young ladies a strong bond of respect and friendship became evident. It was clear that they came from vastly different backgrounds. In using pictures of household appliances for word recognition and conversation starters the Iraqi ladies shone. The Afghani ladies looked bewildered.

It is hard to teach about the kitchen when you still have to walk to the communal well for water. The concepts were just not there.

When we talked about family wants and needs though we were on the same ground. Not surprisingly in this world of fragmentation and division through religion, race and politics we all want the same things for our family and friends. Just as the concept of a washing machine was unfamiliar to the Afghani families, the concept of peace for Australians is equally unfamiliar.

It is unfamiliar because we take it for granted. Peace for these young mothers was much more immediate. When the Australian government offered the Afghani families $10,000 to return to a ‘peaceful’ Afghanistan the young mothers comment to me was “I don’t want to take my babies back because for 21 years, sometimes peace, sometimes war”.

Often, to encourage their English conversation, I would play the part of an official gaining details from them. The ladies love this, as they became very used to the questions and confident in their answers.

Fatima, one of the Afghani mothers, would smile widely when I asked her where she wanted to go. “Please give me a visa, I want to go to Australia today”. “Is that all?” I would reply. “No, I want my family to be happy and healthy as well”.

With the end of the conversation there would be self-congratulatory smiles all round.

This week Fatima died in detention. She finally got her wish to remain in Australia. I see her smiling face before me and her words “You are a good teacher”, strike at my heart.

I only hope that Fatima gets the chance to have the rest of her wish fulfilled; that her husband and her three little children continue to be healthy and ultimately happy in a country that will accept them as refugees.

Lawrence highlights widowed asylum seeker’s case

Radio National PM
Tuesday, February 18, 2003 18:30
ABC News Online

MARK COLVIN: The Labor backbencher, Carmen Lawrence, renewed her attack on the treatment of asylum seekers today. She raised the case of a bereaved Afghan family which agreed to the Government’s request that they return home. The family has had a torrid time of it since making its journey to Australia. The father and his three young children were denied refugee status in Australia, and a month ago, the mother died in a Perth hospital. This week, the surviving family was to have been voluntarily returned to Afghanistan, along with the body of the 28-year old woman. But things have got worse along the way, as Louise Yaxley reports.

LOUISE YAXLEY: Ali Reza Efrani, his wife and three young children arrived in Australia in 2001 on a boat, and were detained at the Christmas Island detention centre. After more than a year in detention Mr Efrani’s wife, 28-year old Fatima, died in a Perth hospital in January after apparently suffering extremely high blood pressure. Last Saturday, just on a month after her death, Ali Reza Efrani and the children aged three, six and seven, left Christmas Island after agreeing to go home to Afghanistan. They got as far as Dubai, but could not get any further because of heavy snow closing Kabul Airport. Mr Reza and his three children and the casket containing Fatima’s [remains] were stranded at the terminal. His lawyer, Christmas Island resident Judith Quinlivan, says he was desperate, and telephoned her for help.

JUDITH QUINLIVAN: He could see from where he was that her body was in its coffin, I think, lying on the tarmac. He kept repeating to me, “Fatima is in the sun, she’s in the sun, and I don’t know what to do.” And he rang me from Dubai to see if I could help, this kind of awful situation with he and his children feeling very stranded and alone, and complicated by the fact that his wife’s body was out of refrigeration and just abandoned seemingly on the tarmac.

LOUISE YAXLEY: Frauke Schaefer from the International Organisation for Migration office in Canberra, denies that Mrs Efrani’s body was left without refrigeration, she says the family wasn’t left without support long, and blames Dubai Airport staff for telling an IOM official that the plane had already left for Afghanistan, when it hadn’t.

FRAUKE SCHAEFER: The group was supposed to board the flight and did board the flight around noon, and the IOM staff was assured by the Airport staff that the flight had departed, and then she left the airport as her duty was over, and later on, a short time after that, she was informed that the flight actually did not depart, and she returned immediately to the airport to look after the passengers.

LOUISE YAXLEY: And when will the family reach Afghanistan?

FRAUKE SCHAEFER: The flight is now rescheduled again for today to depart at 10pm Dubai time, that means, yeah, in the evening of this Tuesday, Canberra time.

LOUISE YAXLEY: Labor’s Carmen Lawrence says the whole incident is a sign the system is heartless. She’s angry that even a family which agreed to go home was treated this way so soon after the mother’s death and without Mr Reza being given the chance to give evidence into the coronial hearing into his wife’s death.

CARMEN LAWRENCE: Yes, I mean it shows a very cruel and insensitive treatment of Ali Reza and his children after the death of Fatima, sending them back so soon after the death and obviously then apparently leaving them stranded with no back-up, speaks very poorly of the Minister and the Department’s interest in people leaving Australia.

LOUISE YAXLEY: You believe that they should have been given more time to cope after the death of their mother?

CARMEN LAWRENCE: It would have been far more sensitive to do so, to make sure they had some opportunity to grieve. But more importantly in the long-term, not just for the family but also for our confidence in the system, they should have been, they should have remained here until the coronial inquiry was completed.

MARK COLVIN: Labor backbencher, Carmen Lawrence, ending Louise Yaxley’s report.

Out of sight, out of mind

Virginia Jealous
Sunday 16 February 2003
Christmas Island

I am beside myself with rage and distress. Please use/distribute this story where you can.

On Saturday afternoon a young man boarded a plane on Christmas Island. He was farewelled by Muslim, Christian and secular well-wishers – the first time in his fifteen-month detention that ‘ordinary’ community members have been able to speak with him.

He was accompanied by his three small children who, like him, are now good English speakers and have integrated well into the local school. His wife would have been with them, but she died in Australia a month ago, in a hospital where no friends were allowed to visit and support him during his vigil at her bedside. Any inquest proceedings into her death will be somewhat hampered because his village – if it still exists – has no street names, house numbers, telephones, post office.

In the two days following his departure he will have travelled via Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur and Dubai to Kabul. There, if transport is available, he will have taken a 15-hour road trip to his village. If it is still there, his family may or may not be; he doesn’t know because of course he’s been unable to contact them (see above). He fears to stay in Afghanistan and plans to leave again soon via Pakistan and Iran. Perhaps those two well-known bastions of human rights will be easier on him than Australia has been.

But hey, out of sight, out of mind. Hope you’re feeling proud of yourselves, Mr Howard and Mr Ruddock.

No Room at the Inn

by Pamela Curr
Melbourne
Wednesday 19 February 2003

An update on the deportation of Fatima’s family

We must never underestimate this governments capacity for cruelty, nor the media’s capacity to be silent.

Fatima’s husband, a young widower with 3 children aged 2, 4 and 7 years set off on Saturday afternoon on a sad and lonely journey from Christmas Island back to Afghanistan. In Dubai he met up with the body of his wife who had died in Perth. There the family has been stranded since Sunday. The father and his children in the transit lounge and his wife’s body in a coffin on the tarmac. The family is understandably deeply distressed. In the past few hours IOM have transferred the family to a hotel to rest and Fatima’s body was removed from the tarmac. They are waiting for the flight to resume to a snow-bound Afghanistan where they face a 15 hour journey by road to their village if it is still standing.

As of this morning we dont know if they are still waiting.

Before Christmas last year when the children still had a mother and their father a wife, this family was told they had two choices-one to be transported to Nauru with apromise that they would never get to Australia and the second to agree to return to Afghanistan from which they had fled. Fatima said -”better to die in Afghanistan than in a strange place.”

A few months later this 27year old woman was dead leaving a husband and three little children. The Coronial inquiry into her death will take maybe a year or two to occur. By then her children could be dead also of hunger and cold in a war torn , drought-stricken Afghanistan- her husband could be shot, tortured or disappeared for being an Hazara-a member of a minority group in warlord dominated territory.

Well done Australia. There is no room at our Inn!!!!!

Fatima – A Minister’s Shame

Canberra Times Your Say
by Terence Seymour
Tasmanians for Refugees

Dear Minister, It distressed me to learn of Australia’s 9th refugee Death in Custody, these visitors to Australia were supposedly under the protection of yourself and the Department of Immigration Officers.

It will be found that Fatima died in Perth as a direct consequence of your heartless policies Minister.

Fatima was loved by her husband Ali and her 3 children aged 2,4 and 7.

You said Fatima would accompany her husband Ali and her 3 children, out of the Christmas Island Detention Centre.

But now we learn Mr Ruddock, that Fatima finally caught up with her family in Dubai.

You lied Mr Ruddock, why did you hide Fatima?

What are you trying to hide Mr Ruddock?

Why Minister do you have so little respect for family life that you permitted her family to leave Australia for their sad and lonely journey from Christmas Island back to Afghanistan without their loved mother and wife.

It is to your eternal shame that the religious beliefs of these visitors to Australia are disrespected.

I ask that you tender your resignation as Minister for Immigration and Cultural Affairs, as you are unsuited for the position because of your lack of sensitivity or understanding of other cultures.

You are driven purely by a hard heart.

I will remind you Minister that Fatima who was only 27 said in replying to your offer to send her to Nauru, an island with an absolute minimum of services. – “it is better to die in Afghanistan than in a strange place.”

Minister you must be aware that Ali and the children face a difficult trek back to Afghanistan in icy weather. Very likely the children will not survive the winter.

While Ali could be shot, tortured or disappeared for being an Hazara – a member of a minority group in warlord dominated territory.

All this sure to happen before the Coronial Inquiry into Fatima’s Death.

With no surviving members of her immediate family the outcome of the Coronial Inquiry may well be lost in the legal system, I am sure this will give you some comfort knowing there will be less personal embarrassment.

The only comfort I get will be the knowledge that you will no longer be a Minister of The Crown when the Coroner brings down his report, and that the Government you represent will have been removed by the Australian People.

The people of Australia will not let Fatima die in vain – you will be haunted by her memory.

I urge readers that share my concern to email the minister at philip.ruddock.MP@aph.gov.au

An Open Letter to Philip Ruddock

Canberra Times Your Say
Kate Wildermuth
Friday, 21 February 2003

I am writing to voice my sadness and disgust at the treatment of Fatima Erfani, her husband Ali and their three children. Fatima died in custody after being held with her family on Christmas Island. I understand she was only 28. Ali and the 3 young children left Australia without knowing where Fatima’s body was. I now understand her body has caught up with the family on their sad journey back to Afghanistan. I beg you for one moment to imagine yourself now in Ali’s shoes. When I try it is just too hard and sad. I pray Ali has the strength to endure what I don’t imagine I can.

Ali and his children will not be in Australia for the Inquiry into the death of Fatima. The family are Hazara. I don’t know Ali and the children will survive upon their return to Afghanistan. They may never know the result of the Coronial Inquiry. I won’t forget and will spread the tragic story of Fatima and her family. I will follow the Inquest and wait for the Coroners report. I don’t know what you will be doing, Mr Ruddock. I don’t know you’ve given Fatima and her family a second thought. I don’t feel safer as a result of your treatment of this family. I feel heartbroken and sickened.

Ruddock as caring guardian

Canberra Times Your Say
Jack H Smit
Friday, 21 February 2003

Re: Open Letter to Ruddock (Kate Wildermuth, 21/02/2003)

Come on, Kate Wildermuth, don’t complain about our excellent and ohhh so effective “deter and deny” refugee policies – Australia’s Very Own Version of the UN Refugee Convention.

The Honorable Minister Ruddock is the Official Guardian of asylum seekers in detention, and he spoke caringly – as caringly as Hannibal Lector would have done if these Australian events would have been a scene from “Silence of the Lambs” – about Fatima Erfani, when he announced on radio that “the corpse will be deported with the family to Afghanistan”.

He also told Australia on air that his very own Mother died just like Fatima.

I didn’t quite get that from Minister Ruddock at the time. I think he must have meant that Mother Ruddock was in some kind of isolated maximum security lock-up on an island like the one Napolean Bonaparte was banned to – without access to the normal things in life for 18 months.

Mother Ruddock must also have been floating in a rickety boat for 11 days in the blazing tropical sun under the control of a NAVY flotilla, like SIEV-6, the boat Fatima came with on her journey to Australia; Mother Ruddock also must have had high blood pressure for six months prior to her death, in this period receiving the most shocking news one can get – which meant that almost her entire existence as a Mother came to a stagnating halt: the country she had travelled to from the other side of the world deemed her an undesirable alien, while as a totally dedicated and devoted Mother she had planned to give the absolute best to her three children.

Finally, Mother Ruddock also must have had an assessed extreme blood pressure of 220 over 120 more than a week before being flown to a hospital – only after having become unconscious more than fifteen hours before being under the care of a surgeon in a hospital.

Don’t be so critial, Kate Wildermuth. The Minister takes good care. It’s a difficult job, being a Minister of Immigration in Australia. It can take up to five years to deport those “undesirable aliens” – only in this case, Fatima’s husband and three children were successfully deported within four weeks of Fatima’s death. Sometimes the Minister works wonders, especially when those nasty human rights lawyers in Australia promise to make his fine work so extremely difficult – and maybe even may become successful in pointing their fingers at him as carrying some kind of responsibility for the ‘unfortunate’ consequences of doing his job so well. Don’t complain. It was only the ninth person who died in an Australian detention centre in two year period.

Ali Reza Irfany replies

Dear friend,

Hello, how are you? We are all well and I thank you very much for your kind words, thoughts and prayers that you sent me and my family.

My children and I leave tomorrow as we are going back to Afghanistan. We don’t know what to expect and it will be difficult without my wife.

We were unable to stay in this situation indefinitely as I need to get on with our lives.

I have received many cards and good wishes from a lot of people. It is impossible to write to them all so I would appreciate it if you could thank everyone for me. I can’t say how much it means to me to receive these kind words from you all.

The children don’t really understand what is happening. We will do our best to continue on with our lives.

There are some very kind people in Australia I will always remember.

Thank you and goodbye.

Ali Reza Irfany
14 February 2003

Time to Dig Deeper: Chile’s Rescued Miners & The Media

October 26th, 2010
 

Comment & Analysis:
Time to Dig Deeper: Chile’s Rescued Miners & The Media (Pablo Navarrete/Alborada.net)
Alborada – Latin America Uncovered
  
Fri, 10/22/2010 – 15:38 — Anonymous

[In both the media’s coverage of the miners’ plight in Chile and of Piñera’s European visit, there has been little attempt to examine why the accident occurred in the first place or to look at the wider context in which it happened.]

Time to Dig Deeper: Chile’s Rescued Miners & The Media

Friday 22 October 2010, by Pablo Navarrete – www.alborada.net

This week Chile’s recently elected rightwing president, Sebastián Piñera, visited Europe to revel in the glow of genuine global delight at last week’s dramatic rescue of the 33 miners trapped in the San José mine in northern Chile. While more than 2,000 journalists reportedly flocked to ‘Camp Hope’ in Chile to cover a story that became a global media event, Piñera’s European tour also received ample coverage. For example we learnt how in highly publicised meetings with British prime minister David Cameron and the Queen, Piñera presented them each with a lump of rock taken out of the San José mine by the rescued miners.

However, in both the media’s coverage of the miners’ plight in Chile and of Piñera’s European visit, there has been little attempt to examine why the accident occurred in the first place or to look at the wider context in which it happened.

Had they dug deeper the media would have uncovered that the miners should never have been trapped in the first place. According to Chile’s mining safety regulations, each mine in operation should have at least two main routes to the surface; at the San José mine there was only one. This flouting of Chilean law has no doubt contributed to the 373 fatal mining accidents in the country in the last decade, with 31 alone this year.

But the government is also to blame. Only 16 government safety inspectors oversee the more than 4,500 mines in Chile. And the government has yet to ratify International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention 176 on Safety and Health in Mines.

This disregard for safety standards is also reflected in the statistics for work-place accidents. In 2009 there were 191,000 workplace accidents, including 443 deaths; there have been 155 deaths in the first three months of this year alone – in a country of around 17 million people.

It is within this context that Néstor Jorquera, president of the federation of mining unions, CONFEMIN, which represents 18,000 Chilean miners, including the 33 miners at the San José mine, suggested that instead of calling the 33 miners “heroes” for surviving their ordeal, it was more appropriate to call them “victims”.

However, the miners are merely the latest victims of the profit over people logic driving Chile’s neoliberal economic model, first imposed under the brutal Pinochet dictatorship. Lamentably, the Concertación, the centre-left coalition that governed Chile from the end of the dictatorship and the return of democracy in 1990 until March this year, while attempting to moderate the harsh social impact of the model, largely continued its economic agenda. This agenda was centred on exporting primary goods, with mineral (primarily copper) exports accounting for around 60 per cent of Chile’s foreign earnings.

Under Pinochet, Chile’s mining sector, which had been nationalised in 1972 under the Salvador Allende government, was opened to foreign investment. CODELCO, the state-owned copper mining company, now controls only 30 per cent of the county’s copper production; foreign companies account for most of the rest. For example, BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto own 57.5 per cent and 30 per cent stakes respectively in the world’s largest copper mine, Escondida, located in northern Chile.

In 2006 alone, these foreign mining companies earned around US$20 billion, which not only exceeds their gross investment in mining in Chile during the past 30 years, but equates to about 60 per cent of the government’s budget for that year. These windfall revenues contrast sharply with the wage of around US$1000 the 33 miners who were entombed in the San José mine would have taken home for a months work. In a country where you have pay for education, health and a range of other basic services, US$1000 does not get you very far, yet is a princely sum by Chilean standards (most Chileans earn little more than the minimum wage of around US$325). There is a similar pattern to the wealth differences mining generates when you look at how income in Chile is distributed more generally. Under Pinochet, Chile went from being one the most equal countries in the continent to one of the most unequal. Whilst significant progress was made in addressing poverty with the return of democracy, inequality is still acute. According to the 2009 UN human development report, Chile is the 19th most unequal country in the world.

For his part, while the international media’s attention was fixed on Chile and throughout his European tour, Piñera has skillfully and systematically attempted to distance himself and Chile’s image from the Pinochet dictatorship. This is understandable, as he and the political coalition he brought into power have strong ties to it. For example Piñera’s fortune, estimated at more than US$1 billion, was amassed during the dictatorship, when his brother and former business partner, José Piñera, a labour minister under Pinochet, was the one who reformed the mining law, opening the mineral sector to private investment. José Piñera was also responsible for the radical deregulation of labour laws, which set back a long history of gains for Chilean workers by the country’s trade unions.

Despite these sobering facts, it is still important to welcome the repeated public commitments Piñera has given in the aftermath of the miners’ rescue to address the lack of health and safety provisions for Chilean workers.

It is also important however that when the media frenzy dies down and the dust has settled, journalists return to Chile to investigate whether Piñera’s rhetoric has been translated into deeds. A failure to do so would be a disservice to the memory of the hundreds of miners and other Chilean workers whose death never captured the media’s attention.

Pablo Navarrete is the editor of www.alborada.net, a website covering Latin America related issues such as politics, media and culture

 

A BOOK ABOUT ONE OF AUSTRALIA’S TRUE WORKING CLASS HEROES – PERCY BROOKFIELD

October 5th, 2010
 

BOOK REVIEW:

 

THE BEST HATED MAN IN AUSTRALIA

    - THE LIFE AND DEATH OF PERCY BROOKFIELD

    1875 – 1921

 

Recently, I received this book review from a close friend and comrade, Chris White, a former secretary of the South Australian Trades & Labour Council.

 

The book is about one of Australia’s greatest and most courageous socialists, Percy Brookfield.

 

 

Some Background about Percy Brookfield

(7 August 1875 – 22 March 1921)

Brookfield was an Australian politician and militant trade unionist. He was a member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1917 until his violent death in 1921.

In parliament he was a member of the ALP until July 1919 and then, after political disagreements, he joined the Industrial Socialist Labour Party.

Brookfield was born in Wavertree, England. He was the son of a grocer and after an elementary education went to sea at age 13. He was discharged from the “Godiva” in Port Melbourne in 1894.

He was a swagman and prospector in New South Wales and Queensland but had settled in Broken Hill by 1910.

He became an official of the Amalgamated Miners’ Association and led the Broken Hill campaign against the introduction of conscription during World War 1.

He was gaoled and reportedly fined ₤700 ($1400) as a result of his anti-conscription activities

State Politics

In February 1917 he won ALP pre-selection for a by-election in the seat of Sturt. Brookfield won the seat with 54% of the primary vote and increased this to 57% at the general election that was held one month later. In parliament he became a leading left-wing advocate and expressed sympathy for the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) and the Russian Revolution. His radicalism led him into conflict with the rest of the ALP caucus and he resigned from it in July 1919.

Industrial Socialist Labor Party

At the March 1920 state elections Brookfield contested the seat of Sturt for the Industrial Socialist Labor Party and, under the multi-member proportional representation system then used, he was the first candidate elected with 27% of the primary vote. Following the election he held the balance of power in the assembly. He supported the Labor government of John Storey and used his position to improve industrial conditions for Broken Hill miners and to overturn the convictions of Australian IWW members gaoled in 1916.

Death

Brookfield died as a result of wounds received when he courageously tried to disarm a deranged white Russian emigree named Koorman Tomayoff at the Riverton railway station railway station, in South Australia on 22 March 1921.

Visit to Broken Hill

Just recently I visited Broken Hill to visit the historic Trades Hall and and Percy’s grave in the large Broken Hill cemetry with my wife, Cathy.

There is a memorial column about 4 meters in height, which has a sphere on top with the words of the IWW motto “Workers of the World Unite”. At the base of the column is some background of Percy Brookfield’s life and the words of the first verse of The People’s Flag. (althoughit calls it The Workers Flag).

Percy Brookfield has been an inspiration to many workers who know his history – especially in Broken Hill. Cathy and I have a friend, Ron Pratt, who was born in Broken Hill. His father, Leo was a miner there for many years.

Before his death, our friend’s father visited us on several occasions and discussed politics with us. He described himself as a socialist, but did not know about Karl Marx and other well known socialists, but he did know of Percy Brookfield and Tom Mann.

When Leo died, Ron asked if we could someone to sing The International at his funeral because he knew his father would like that.

A friend, who is a left wing folk singer was only too happy to oblige and sh did a wonderful job!

Anyway, read Chris’s review below and learn more about a great Australian working class hero.
Andy Alcock

 

The Best Hated Man in Australia

The Life and Death of Percy Brookfield 1875 – 1921

by Paul Robert Adams

Book review by Chris White

During our tweedledum-dee election I read the biography of Percy Brookfield – a conviction left labour politician. 

Historian Dr Paul Robert Adams takes us through Brookfield’s exciting story – the events when a radical unionist becomes a politician and keeps and fights for left principles, ’the greatest champion that the people ever had.’

Not many unionists today know of him. I was in Adelaide having a cup of tea with 90 year old AWU union militant Jim Doyle. He of course had not only studied this labour legend, but at one time his task was to look after the gravesite.

Nobody elected into the NSW Parliament today is like ‘Jack’ Brookfield MP from Broken Hill.  At his funeral 15,000 marched and sang ‘The Red Flag’.

Brookfield’s militant stand and his unrelenting political radicalism is revealing and refreshing. 

He was notorious for his combatative criticisms of ruling class employers and politicians. Today’s unionists and ALP MPs are just far too timid.

The media and right-wing politicians attacked him for his stances, such as, ‘not to fight for the British flag as long as they were making profits out of the war’.

He was hailed as the most extreme anti-politician ever to be elected. 

He delivered reforms for workers. He became politically more popular nationally with radical speeches at mass meetings.

Adams takes us through Brookfield’s story starting as a key organiser in the great strikes on working conditions and shorter hours for underground mining in Broken Hill. ‘If you want the 44 hour week, TAKE IT.’

We are engaged in the struggles to prevent and then compensate for the industrial diseases and campaigned tirelessly winning Occupational Health and Safety and Workers Compensation reforms.

Before, during WW1 and the years that followed saw radical labour movement battles and unprecedented political turmoil.

Brookfield supported the 1917 NSW General Strike. We are taken through the 1919 Great Miners Strike/Lockout.

Brookfield was a supporter of the OBU, One Big Union.

He on principle campaigned successfully over many years to free the ‘IWW Twelve’ from their trumped up police convictions to burn down Sydney. He supported many left activists persecuted by the government’s ‘anti-terrorist’ laws of those days.

Governments prosecuted him.  He was jailed for his principled anti-war speeches against the viper – PM Hughes.

His powerful leadership against conscription contributed to the success of the NO referendums. 

A socialist not a communist, he learnt about and supported the new Bolshevik revolution and their supporters. 

He always spoke the truth as he saw it. ‘Ironically, while he was an extremist, he was able to put his opinions in a way that drew people to him rather than driving them away.’

Adams recounts the left labour movement struggles with the colorful leaders like Brookfield and their battles with right-wing enemies, the NSW ALP. In Parliament Brookfield was tenacious and outspoken for his left causes.

Brookfield later joined the split from the NSW Right ALP to form the Industrial Socialist Labor Party and was reelected and held the balance of power in the NSW hung parliament.  

The reader knows in advance that Brookfield was then fatally shot at Riverton in South Australia. 

Was his shooting an assassination? Adams takes us through the events.

Although these are different times, our unstable capitalist contradictions and the environmental crisis invite militant left convictions and organising.

Left activists struggling against powerful corporations, right-wing forces and their political representatives are invigorated by this history.

I agree with Humphrey McQueen’s comments and other reviews.

In life, as in the manner of death, Brookfield made personal sacrifice the measure of his political commitment. Morally and physically fearless, his probity withstood parliament.  Paul Adams has given us a biography as thoroughly gripping as it is thoroughly researched. Inspiration floods from its pages’.

Please inform bookshops and libraries and union resources.

Dr Paul Robert Adams was born in Broken Hill. He holds a PhD from The University of Sydney and currently teaches media at The University of New England. 

(Puncher & Wattmann 2010) httw://www.puncherandwattmann.com 

Chris White, former Secretary UTLC of SA, posts on his blog http://chriswhiteonline.org


Robert Fisk: Nine years, two wars, hundreds of thousands dead – and nothing learnt Saturday [The Independent 11 September 2010]

September 12th, 2010
The Independent & The Independent on Sunday

WHO WAS TOM MANN? by Don Sutherland.

September 10th, 2010

This article is about the famous British socialist and unionist, Tom Mann, who contributed so much to unionism social justice and socialist thought during his stay in Australia in the early years of the 20th century. donsuth1@gmail.com )Who was Tom Mann? And what does he mean for unionists in thest Century?By Don SutherlandThis article draws upon an article by Laurie Carmichael, then the Assistant National Secretary of the Amalgamated Metals sources, other books and articles and various library sources that are acknowledged in the article. In particular,s biography of Tom Mann covers in detail the period before and after his years in Australia, including the constantMany AMWU1 members and other members of the public have at some time walked through thethe Tom Mann Theatre. Many people would haves intention has been (and remains) to cultivate ands commitment to art and theatre, including the professional, union and communityWhy should the AMWU remember Tom Manns legacy inIn brief, Tom Mann was a towering figure in the international union andth century and in the first 3 decades2 who never aspired to aFormative yearsTom was born in Warwickshire, England, in 1856 but his mother died when he was 2. At1The Australian Manufacturing WorkersUnion.2Tom Mann as an orator can be seen at: http://www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=15543 , and associated2mullock overburden from coal mine ventilation shafts in steel boxes madethese were pulled on all fourswith a chain attached to a belt around3At 14, after a colliery fire, he was bondedin apprenticeship for 7 years to a4His education, aside from his trade learning, was steeped in religion andan encyclopaedic self education stimulated by a5. He embraced astronomy and played the violin. He co-founded theAstronomyand Progress and Poverty.as an activistSweden, America, South Africa, NZ, China, Ireland, Canada and the USSR.The union in his lifeThroughout his long life he retained the closest association with the Amalgamated Society of6 Joseph White describes him as a Society man7 Some years after his return to England he became its General Secretary for 3depressionhe created 2 ASE BranchesAustralia Councilof the union, then the memberships peak8.9Laurie Carmichael, AMWU Monthly Journal (pp 8-11). 1976, p. 84Ibid, p. 95Ibid., p 96Ibid., p. 97Joseph White, Tom Mann, Lives of the Left, Manchester University Press, 19918Tom Mann, Memoirs, MacGibbon and Kee, 1967 edition, p. 1779Ken Buckley, The Amalgamated Engineers in Australia, 1970.3agitationalorganising focussed on the smelters at Port Pirie, and the iron ore mines at Iron Knob and Whyalla:In three weeks at Broken Hill Mann persuaded 1600 to join the union and at Port Pirie10Social consciousness in action: some of Tom Manns activitiesIn his memoirs Tom traces the beginning of his social consciousness to 1880. Soon he committedstruggles wherever he was, and wherever he was invited, to assist through11, alongside Ben Tillett,dockers tanner” – sixpence a day. The12 After the strike he was elected president of theUnion.There was great police brutality and 2 gunboats were anchored in midstream in the Mersey off13Jim Moss, Sound of Trumpets, History of the Labour Movement of South Australia, Wakefield Press, 1985,11For more on the Dockers Strike and the contribution of Australian unionists,http://www.portcities.org.uk/london/server/show/ConNarrative.77/chapterId/1857/The-Great-Dock-.12See Australian Unionists Support the London Dockers, 1889in Noel Ebbels, The Australian Labour13Carmichael, p. 9Comment [a1]:Just to confirms no first name here?4incitement to mutinybecause from a meeting platform during thatat the age of 77 for unemployed agitation during the Great Hunger March of 1932.14Tom Mann in AustraliaAccompanied by his second wife15, Elsie, and their two children, Tom arrived in Australia in 190216Bertha Walker describes his arrival in her sadly neglected bookSolidarity Forever17:Two days before polling day in the Victoria State Elections of 1902, an Englishman whoin those seven years (he) leftthbirthday, large celebrations were held in Melbourne to coincide with other celebrationsOn arrival he was invited and accepted the post of paid organiser for the Labor Party up to 1905.put up posters, promote the meeting, take the chair, speak, sell literature and. 18He was also a regular speaker at the Sydney Domain, especially when invitedbarnstorming tourof the state.19Ibid.15Elsie Harker, who he met while organising in Newcastle on Tyne. It appears that Elsie and Tom were not16For more on the New Zealand activity see his Memoirs and also Joseph White, Tom Mann.17About the life and times of Australian labour leader, Percy Laidler18Ibid., p.1019The Bitter Fight, a Pictorial History of the Australian Labor Movement, by Joe Harris, Page 143.5socialisttea thatBijou Theatre Sunday.20The Bijou Theatretowards the eastern end of BourkeFrom his English experience he reproduced creative recreational activity: a band, orchestra andoperatic voice of Elsie Mann, Licentiate of the Academy of Music21. These were a part ofmagic lantern.The struggle forfree speechin PrahranMann was a fearless champion of free speech and this came to a peak in thePublic meetings were often held byThe VSP encouraged all who were arrested to refuse on principle to pay fines and continued toAmongst those imprisoned were Tom Mann, sitting on the right, Joe22For more on the Victorian Socialist Party, read Noel Ebbels, The Australian Labour Movement, 1850-1907,21In our Time, Socialism and the Rise of Labor 1885-2005, by Verity Burgmann, George Allen and Unwin,22National Library Note: This asset indicates that women were in the forefront of the socialist movement and the free6packed Melbourne Town Hall23The Broken Hill Lockout of 1908-9Laurie Carmichael describes the Broken Hill Lockout of 1909 asthe most famous episode of hiss) life in Australia.In this dispute, just a couple of years after the new commonwealthdeclared that a24Like many workers from several countries before and after, the mine workers asked Tom Mann tohis closest associate in the25At his first meeting with 3000 mine workers he said:Organise thet get through.26 Carmichael sayss he saw in the old AEUthe original Tom Mann drawings of the picket lines inline of lodetaking every detail of27 Hundreds of police had to be brought in toscab labour to get through.28The story unfolds, firstly in the words of George Dale and then in those of Tom Mann himself:29In September, BHP Chairman, Mr. John Darling announced an effective wage cut of 12.5% for staff across all BHP enterprises.23These postcards are from the ‘Melbourne Gaol Series’ published by the Victorian Socialist Party (VSP) as24Carmichael, p.1025Carmichael, p. 1126Ibid., p.1027Ibid., p.10: Carmichael adds I was transfixed by the conception and its brilliant execution that must have28For more on these picket lines, and also on membership growth methods read Chapter 2 of Strikes: Studies29All of this from http://www.abc.net.au/federation/fedstory/ep3/ep3_places.htm7flourishing revolvers in one hand and striking with batons with the other.”everything was orderly and the line of routeTom was charged with unlawfulHill” – 3,000 to 4,000 people -The Tom Mann. There Mann addressed thes trial was conducted in Albury, a rural city surrounded by the lands of rich farmbefore a notoriously anti working class judge. But he won acquittal from the jury to be30Tom left Australia with Elsie and his children in late 1909 for 4 months of lectures in South AfricaTom had taught Australia a great deal. He had pioneered mass organisation, showedcontinentalbut applied to all countries. He broke down.31He tried on 2 occasions to return to Australia. In 1918 he was refused by the Hughes (Labor)30Carmichael, p. 11.31Bertha Walker, Solidarity Forever!, the National Press, 898What does he mean for unionismin our own times?Tom Manns ideas have been captured in his own Memoirs and also in Toms Social and Economic Writings, edited by John Laurent and jointly32. The 6 pieces ins collection cover the 8 Hour Day, religion, socialism, class conflict andThe Way to Win.the metabolic riftbetweenmore international than ever – drivess efforts, just prior to settingsThe Way to Winwas published by Broken Hills Barrier Daily Truth in May 1909, not long after theorganisation, a visionif you like. The detail of thisSocialism(see below) and in his many speeches. This article is much moremachineryfor achieving this object and specifically tackles the problem of sectionalism inSectionalism must disappear, and the industrial organisations must be equal to State,33To a certain extent, Manns proposals now take their modern form in the state labour councils and32This important book can be found in some AMWU office storerooms and on the bookshelves of somes National Library. It is possible to find a copy here9the ideological perspective, specifically he discusses theExperience in all countries shows most conclusively that industrial organisation,for entirely34Everything he did was to encouragerank and fileunionism. He was strongly opposed tohe considered it robbed the workers of their independence and their capacity to35In around 1902, he wrote:whatever may be said by arbitration courts, the only rightful reward toand Act or no Act, the standard wont be high36And then later in his memoirs he reflected on Australian arbitration,As a result of the working of37H.V. Evatt, in his outstanding Australian Labour Leader, about the origins of the Australian Labors advocacy of the industrial unitas the basis of union organisation, andin an important Pamphlet, The Way to Win, and which he points outSolidarity Forever. Evatt pointss thinking about both industrial unionism and arbitration in theAfter fighting on constitutional lines the unions obtained a satisfactory award from38. But the Full High Court unanimously upset a vital part of the awardThis experience, said Mann, of the admittedly most perfect Arbitration Court.3934Tom Mann, The Way to Win, in Social and Economic Writings, p. 14635Carmichael, p. 1036Cited in K.D. Buckleys The Amalgamated Engineers in Australia, 1852 1920, 1970. Buckley is citing Manns Monthly Report, of November 1902.37Cited in Buckley, page 167.38He of the Harvester Decision that established the basic wage DSnote.39H.V. Evatt, Australian Labour Leader: The Story of W.A. Holman and the Labour Movement, Angus and10especially the unskilled. 40He added to this, arguing inside the councils of the union forindustry unionism:“…the broadening of the basis (of trade unionism), the merging of sectional unions, the. The needs of the hour are for alland never have a strike that is not backed by the41There is a vivid description of his organising method in his own words in Graeme OsbornesTown and Company42. His method involved planning, identifying the central issues of concern fors ideas about worker and industrial organisation continued to develop in the decades after hiss 1976 article coincided with a genuine mass movement aroundworkers controlin Australia. Including what became known as the green bans. He points outWe aim at applying the principle of workers control in the shops, factories, mills, mines,43Manns Australian experience confirmed his commitment to syndicalismas the best form of44 For Mann, syndicalism involves directUnlike syndicalismin general, Manns approach included thes approachs advocacy of syndicalismwas driven by educational activity. He helped to formIndustrial Syndicalist Education Leagueand through it sought to win popularplatform work), pamphlets and its40Graeme Osborne, ‘Mann, Thomas (Tom) (1856 – 1941)’, Australian Dictionary of Biography, Volume 10, Melbourne, 1986, pp 395-396.41Cited in Buckley, p. 18142Strikes, page 3543Carmichael, p. 1144Memoirs, pp 203-21311s efforts to develop a pit to port,s account is his willingness to critique his experience and forms ofs ecology?Mann and SocialismSocialismis the longest essay in Social and Economic Writings. It was first published by Tocsin,s thinking out of his livedan immense store of energy was released,45 includings daughter, Eleanor, herself a popularleader in England and Europe. However, his approach to socialism sought to link the.46Manns Socialismrecommends that understanding it proceeds from independent and criticalpovertyits extent, its effects and its causes, and how it might be abolished. His stand for socialismis notismor ologybut THE ABOLITION OF POVERTY …”47He places great emphasis – correctly – on the reality and economics ofexploitationandappropriationas the core of capitalism, and then addresses its morality, and the alternatives Socialismplaces emphasis on the cooperativedimension relative to thestateor governmentalsocialism. He argues for workers being innot. He shows how socialismworks in the present, and is not just a dream for a (much48 This invites us to think about twenty first century socialism.and the others in Laurents collection – demonstrate Manns passionate45Carmichael, p. 1146J. N. Evans, Great Figures in the Labour Movement, p. 49.47Tom Mann, Socialism, in Laurent, p. 8248Ibid., pp 94-9812It dawned on me that I had missed something in the education49In conclusionWhen Tom Mann died,red flags were hung at half-mast over many public and Labour buildings in50 Carmichael concluded, in 1976:“…the workers of the world and of Australia in particular owe a great deal to thisHe stands as a giant in our reflections upon those who created our movement and there51For all of us joining together in acts of solidarity and struggle against all forms of injustice ands potential as a learning, intellectuals union activist is a person who converses outside of his or her own circle of friends, readsblue collarto being not well read and proud of it.s union activist harnesses the ongoing acquisition of knowledgesocialistor communist. Who49Tom Mann, Memoirs, Macgibbon and Kee, 1967, page 450Ibid., p. 55.51Ibid., p. 11

The article is written by Don Sutherland, who is the National Industrial Officer of the AMWU (Australian Manufacturing Workers Union). Don has been a teacher and has worked for the ACTU before working at the AMWU.

I believe that Don’s article is a very important one as it gives us a valuable insight into the history of Australian unionism and progressive politics. 

© Don Sutherland August 2010 (

early 21

©

August 2010

Workers Union, in the June 1976 edition of the AMWU Monthly Journal (pp 8-11). Additional material has been drawn

from Laurie

Joseph White

evolution of his approach to unionism and politics.

foyer of the old AMWU headquarters at 136 Chalmers St, Surry Hills, (Sydney) and seen on their

left a hardy and well used, popular theatre

participated in public meetings, mass meetings of members, film nights, university lectures, and

plays in this theatre. Many others would have seen the occasional reference to the theatre in union

journals and leaflets.

In 1976, in opening its new national headquarters, and to its great and lasting credit, the National

Council of the AMWU named the theatre after Tom Mann, one of the great figures in Australian,

British and international unionism. The union

express it

organisations that bring this to life.

such a permanent and visible way?

socialist movement at the end of the 19

of the twentieth century. He was a metal worker and an outstanding union

organiser and educator, an inspirational leader for workers in several

countries, a life long learner and powerful orator

parliamentary career. From 1902 he worked as a union organiser and

political activist in Australia and New Zealand. He developed and held a

cosmopolitan and socialist world outlook, settling with ease wherever he travelled.

links.

age 9 he went to work in the underground coal mines. For 4 years he dragged

like sledges (without wheels) 30 inches long, 18 inches wide, and 18 inches

deep

his waste and thighs. A candle on the box lit his way.

toolmaking firm in Birmingham, starting with a 60 hour, 6 day week and

frequent 2 hours overtime of an evening with no penalty rates.

temperance. But from his early twenties he pursued

desire for social change

Shakespeare Mutual Improvement Society in London, attended science and art classes, and gave

lectures himself on

He visited France and worked in the USA, and remained a life long traveller, visiting

Engineers (later the Amalgamated Engineering Union, and leading through important

amalgamations, ultimately to the AMWU as it is known today). He represented branches and

districts everywhere and held every branch office.

if ever there was one.

years or so. In Australia he represented the union on the Trades Hall Council in Victoria, organised

for it in Tasmania, WA, Queensland, and SA, and met with union members when travelling through

each of the states.

In 3 weeks of organising in Tasmania, during an economic

in Zeehan and Queenstown, only possible because of significant membership growth, and

submitted 7 written reports to the

body. His account of his Tasmanian organising includes a short, vivid account of environmental

damage brought on by mining activity

In 1904 he visited the Kalgoorlie Branch of the union, which was soon in full struggle with the gold

mine owners over overtime rates and poor arbitration decisions.

3

He visited SA in 1904 to give lectures, and then in 1907 and 1908, in association with the Broken

Hill Lockout dispute, he brought the SA labour movement to life with systematic

he had proportionately better results.

himself to workers

lectures and organising activity.

He worked for a brief period as a production worker or cleaner to learn how to build the struggle

against the severest conditions, for example the 7-day 12-hour shifts in a Cheshire factory.

Famously, he was in the leadership group for the

London Dock Strike of 1889

Henry Champion, John Burns and others. The strike

was for the

conduct of this strike can be read as a master class in

union organising, with international solidarity an

essential element, and Australian unions playing a major

role.

Dockers

He edited newspapers and wrote for many more, and in

addition he wrote and published pamphlets, lectures and speeches.

In 1884 he joined the Battersea Branch of the Social Democratic Federation, his first political party.

He urged it to support the fight for the 8 hour day so that it might connect to the union movement.

When Tom returned to England after his years in Australia he became Chairman of the Liverpool

Transport Workers Strike Committee in 1911. This was a very tough strike that lasted 72 days.

Birkenhead with their guns trained on Liverpool. 7,000 troops and 80,000 specials were organised

against the strikers.

10

page 217

Strike-of-1889.html

Movement, 1850-1907, Australasian Book Society, 1960.

there

The strikers won, but Tom was being watched closely by the secret police of the day, and a year later

he was gaoled for 6 months for

struggle he read from a leaflet urging the soldiers not to shoot at their brothers.

He was gaoled many times for his activities, or charged unsuccessfully (in Australia, see below),

including

and left in 1909. Elsie was a singer and writer and, like Tom, a socialist, and they remained lifelong

partners.

Just before arriving in Australia, Tom and his family lived in NZ for several months. There he was

active in the Socialist Party and made a detailed study of the much lauded industrial utopia that the

English at home believed was in place.

was to leave a greater impact than any other, came to Melbourne. He went from the boat

and addressed 12 meetings before the Poll, in support of the Victorian Labor Party. The

labour movement was won by his personality, ability as an orator and the downrightness of

the principles he enunciated. His name was Tom Mann and

so big an impression that in 1936 (27 years after his departure) on the occasion of his 80

throughout the world.

He travelled to every town he could, big and small, creating Labor Party branches wherever it was

necessary. Laurie Carmichael (pictured) said in 1976 that many of these still existed at that time.

Maybe they still do. He was often a one person organising force, he would

win over the audience finishing with an ovation

by the miners to help organise a major struggle they were engaged in at the

time. He is also credited as a major contributor to the adoption of the

socialist objective at the Queensland Labor in Politics Convention of 1905,

following a

14

legally married at that time, and they remained lifelong partners..

He formed the Victorian Socialist Party in 1905

and led it with a vigorous and all round approach

to political life: Sunday morning lectures at Port

Melbourne Pier, in the afternoon speeches at the

Yarra Bank, a Socialist Sunday School that spread

interstate, a Sunday evening

was capped off by the

Night Lectures, regularly attracting 1000 in

attendance

Street, Melbourne

choir were formed with dozens of concerts joined by poets and writers. The concerts were treated

to the

the lectures that covered social action, science, philosophy, sociology, economics, art and politics.

Leading Labor Party figures like John Curtin and John Cain were also prominent lecturers. His

lectures included pictures of the London Dockers Strike and other important events and

phenomena projected onto a screen from a

famous Prahran (Melbourne suburb) free speech struggle of

late 1906. The Victorian Socialist Party produced postcards to

rouse support for the campaign. As the National Library note

to these postcards says:

Socialists, the Salvation Army and other bodies in side streets

in Prahran but a campaign of public persecution took place

from October to December 1906 when Socialists were refused

permits to speak by the Prahran City Council and were singled

out for arrest and imprisonment.

organise public meetings in defiance of the police action. Over twenty Socialists were fined or

imprisoned, half of them refusing to pay the fine and serving periods from ten days to five weeks in

Old Melbourne Gaol.

Swebleses, Frank Hyett and Lizzie Ahern, probably the woman in front.

20

Extracts from Contemporary Documents, Australasian Book Society, 1960.

Sydney, Page 131

speech fight – four women, Miss Ahern, Mrs Anderson, Mrs Jarvis and Mrs Edwards, were arrested for speaking at

public meetings and all chose to go to prison rather than pay fines; the woman in the postcard is probably Lizzie Ahern

(1877-1969), who joined the VSP in 1905 and whose speeches on the banks of the Yarra River were said to have been

so popular that women would happily lose a day’s pay to hear her views.

In one dramatic action (one of several during this campaign) at a

meeting he led 14 others onto the stage to speak in prison garb.

(Mann

Conciliation and Arbitration Act that dominated Australian politics for nearly a hundred years, the

mine owners who were making their fortunes had locked out the workforce and

return to work would be only on a twelve and half percent wage cut.

come and help them in their struggle, and of course he did. Harry

Holland was also involved and was

Hill dispute. He later became Prime Minister of New Zealand.

picket lines so tight a rabbit won

that on a visit to Broken Hill in the 1960

offices

staggered formation around the

terrain into account.

break these lines for the owners

Workers in the highly unionised town of Broken Hill rejected this cut. An application was made to settle the dispute before the

Federal Arbitration Court and a hearing was set for February 1909.

On December 7, 1908, BHP General Manager, Guillaume Daniel Delprat, posted notices around the city declaring that only men

who accepted the reduced wage would be employed. Workers refused to accept any alteration until the case went before the

Arbitration Court. A lockout was put in place by BHP, assisted by arms, provisions and watchmen. Unionists set up pickets around

the mines.

Between New Year and January 9 tensions were high; an explosion cut a railway line to BHP’s lease and scab workers were jeered

and stoned. Two hundred extra police were moved to Broken Hill from Sydney and Adelaide. The situation came to a head on

Saturday, January 9, 1909 when police blocked a picket procession led by union leader, Tom Mann.

“In a thrice all was confusion, consternation, disorder, violence – men (and women too) were being batoned in all directions. Tom

Mann was struggling with at least 15 policemen. Arrests were being made in all directions. Police, in the excitement, were

propaganda for the ‘Fight for Free Speech’ in Prahran, Melbourne. Original held by National Library of Australia MS

3939, Series 15, Box 67

entailed the most detailed study.

in Twentieth Century Australian History, ed by John Iremonger, John Merritt, and Graeme Osborne,Angus

and Robertson and the ASSLH, 1973,

George Dale, ‘The Industrial History of Broken Hill’ 1965, p.117

Tom Mann wrote:

“The mounted men, like their predecessors, were armed with carbines and revolvers

was the same we had traversed many times before. As the procession approached the thoroughfare on the far side of which was

the company’s property, we found the way blocked by police. They made a dash for the union banner, tore it off the poles and used

the latter on the heads of the men including the bandsmen. For 10 minutes there was as lively a time as I had ever experienced,

and I was in the middle of it. At the end of the fray, I was marched off to the police station, together with 20 of my comrades. We

were all bunged into one large cell.”

Tom Mann, ‘Memoirs’, London 1923

assembly and sedition. A condition of

his bail was that he could not enter

NSW. So, on January 31 and April 11

the

travelled by train and other means to

Cockburn, a town 30 miles away just

across the border in SA. One train

carried a huge banner:

Train

crowd from a buggy in a picnic

atmosphere. On request of the mine

owners, who did not want to be in

Broken Hill, Mann

owners, and

carried out of court to a tumultuous crowd which he then addressed from the balcony of the

George Hotel.

and then to England. His Australian experiences were central to the further development of his

thought and practice over the next 30 years or so of union and socialist activism in several countries.

Writing some years later Bertha Walker summed up his influence in Australia:

that socialism was not purely

(national) chauvinism and introduced internationalism; he taught the necessity of militant

class struggle

government as it dealt with the impact of the 1917 NSW rail strike and the mass anti-conscription

movement of World War 1.

In 1913 he toured the USA, lecturing and organising (it seems that the 2 always went together)

visiting over 70 cities.

Back in Britain he became the first General Secretary of the Amalgamated Engineering Union in

1919, and in that time probably would have overseen the first great amalgamation of the union.

Mann

published by the AMWU and Spokesman Books in 1988

Laurent

the oft quoted

All of them provide insights useful for unionism of the twenty first century. Of

course, in reading or re-reading these works, we must remember that much has

changed in the intervening years, the rise of finance capital and the changed

composition of the working class, for example, and especially the

humans and nature is at a global crisis point. The works must be read in that light to grapple with

key concepts rather than to bicker over fine detail.

But, it is also true that amid all of the great change there is profound continuity: the relationship

between workers and employers remains based on exploitation whether in China, the USA, Brazil or

Australia; production exists for profitability and private ownership before all else, there is great

poverty amid plenty, and competition between employers

down wages and conditions in the absence of solidarity among workers. On this latter point, in his

biography of Tom Mann, Joseph White describes in some detail Mann

out for Australia, to establish international union organising in the transport industry. Mann

rationale is remarkably consistent with our contemporary understanding of corporate globalisation.

Two articles in the Laurent collection demand further comment.

bitter dispute described above. It is about union organisation, organising and also about strategy. It

starts with just 2 paragraphs about the object of

vision is dealt with in

about the

Australian unionism in the form prevailing at the time, and his recommended strategy to build

working class strength:

national, and international action, not in theory only, but in actual fact.

the ACTU. But is sectionalism dead in contemporary unionism? What form does it take in our

times? What sort of problems does the contemporary form of sectionalism present to workers and

officials of the union. There are a few copies in the union

and there in decent second hand bookshops. Contact the writer of this article if you have trouble finding a

copy.

their unions? What might be done within our present movement to defeat sectionalism and replace

it with a more powerful unity?

Mann also deals with what might be called

primary role of unionism independent of political parties. He is not against parliamentary

participation and intervention at all. But he lays out the essential economic and social learning that

must be developed as a pre-condition for effective parliamentary intervention:

intelligently conducted, is of much more moment than political action,

irrespective as to which school of politicians is in power, capable and courageous industrial activity forces

from the politicians proportionate concessions.

arbitration because

act for themselves.

the workers is the full produce of their labours

unless there is powerful organisation.

these Acts, the unions grew in membership, but lost fighting efficiency.

Party, comments on Mann

the elaboration of his ideas

are also captured in the classic and still widely loved union song,

out the confirmation of Mann

Broken Hill dispute:

Justice Higgins

upon the ground that such part was outside the ambit of the original dispute, or, in other

words, the employees in their log of claims had not formally asked for the particular

concession granted.

in existence, damped any enthusiasm I might have felt for such an institution

from the union

Robertson, Sydney, 1942.

In organising, his primary concern was to organise all classes of workers

separation of the economic or fighting fund from the friendly society portion, and the

trend towards unity of action over the whole industrial field, is receiving attention now in

NSW, Victoria and New Zealand more particularly

unions to pool their fighting funds

whole of the kindred trades. Because compulsory arbitration would make this impossible,

I repudiate compulsory arbitration.

workers and the impact these have on their lives, defining the best claim(s), a continuous

educational effort, building to high density (98% in the example he describes), and then action.

Mann

Australian experience. Carmichael

that Mann remained true to this dynamic dimension of union activity until his death. At the age of

71 he wrote:

ships and railroads until we get complete control.

worker organisation, from the point of view of workers.

action by workers themselves through industry federations of unions to take control of how work

should be done in each industry.

involvement and participation of well established unions. It was not be sectarian.

Syndicalist organisation works independently of parliamentary activity. However, Mann

stresses independent worker organisation that is the pre-requisite and foundation of effective

political activity, not necessarily a replacement for it.

Therefore, Mann

and chaired the

support for the syndicalist approach through public speaking (

newspaper.

University Press

One contemporary example of this is the AMWU WA Branch

multi union approach to organising and bargaining. One can suspect that Mann would be nodding

from his grave in strong approval of this effort.

What is refreshing in Mann

organisation, and to experiment with new forms and to pursue such possibilities in a non sectarian

manner. Worker organisation at any given time is never perfect or totally adequate for the challenges

thrown in front of it by employers (as they evolve themselves) and the development of capitalism

itself. From a hundred years ago he urges us, in our times, to ask ourselves: Are unions, as they are

currently formed, adequate for the challenges faced by working people, the life defining challenges

of globalised mega exploitation of both billions of people and the globe

a left wing newspaper of the Victorian labour movement, in Melbourne in 1905. It is an essay of

great importance. Above all, it reveals the development of Mann

experiences complemented with deep and wide background reading, and sets the tone for a new

stage in his practical activity.

Mann became a socialist at the age of 30 and

a comprehensive study of Marxism. He was friends with Marx

workers

theory of socialism with the need to bring new life into the day-to-day struggles of workers. Trade

unionism by itself was not enough, socialism must become its inspiration

thinking, including understanding the arguments against it. This process must focus upon

the backing up of an

morality that socialism must stand for. Mann

collective command of their workplaces and industries. The role of government and the broader

state is to enhance not dominate over this process.

In a memorable section he declares point after point what Socialism stands for, and then briefly

what it is

deferred) future.

Both of these essays

embrace and advocacy of lifelong learning and cultural development. This grew directly out of his

apprenticeship years when he benefited from the great national strike that reduced engineering

hours to 9 hours per day in 1872:

line; I realised that, by the Education Act of 1870, all boys under 14 were now required to attend

school.

Australia.

incredible man who created Prime Ministers and dozens of MPs but who kept his own

efforts exclusively for union action and the socialist movement.

is no honour we can pay to the memory of this great metal worker in Australia that is too

high.

exploitation, Tom Mann shows the significance of each worker

being; including as an active union member. Not an academic intellectual. Rather, an intellectual

where the workplace and industry is the university, workmates are our tutors, constantly learning

why and how to conduct struggle against exploitation by doing it together; for whom the kitchen

table is a site for personal, more systematic learning, using books, newspapers, magazines (and now

the internet).

Mann

beyond the immediate requirements of day to day work, thinks critically, and expresses ideas in

voice and writing and does not reduce worker and union communication to slogans and

exhortation. Who definitely does not equate

Who engages in debate, and learns and applies comradely critical analysis to self and others. Who

allows union and political belief and practice to evolve from experience. Who advocates what

should happen instead, not just what is wrong now. Who speaks and acts beyond slogans and seeks

to educate, as well as agitate. Mann

to the mobilisation of the workers and others against the capitalist system of exploitation and all of

the forms that it takes, old and new. Who has no fear of labels like

learns the difference between exploitation and injustice and also their causal relationship. Who

opposes individualism with personal and collective thought and action, but respects and advances

individuality, the development of each of our unique personalities and capacities in harmony with

others and with nature.

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2010:MEDIA STATEMENT: POLITICAL PARTIES & HUMAN RIGHTS & SOCIAL JUSTICE IN OUR REGION

August 19th, 2010

 

MEDIA STATEMENT: POLITICAL PARTIES & HUMAN RIGHTS & SOCIAL JUSTICE IN OUR REGION

In a joint announcement today, the Australia West Papua Association-SA and the Australia East Timor Friendship Association SA Inc called on Australians to vote for parties that will give a priority to human rights in our region in the forthcoming federal election. 

On 3 August, they sent a list of 5 questions to candidates of the major political parties about what they would be prepared to do about important justice and human rights issues in the Asia Pacific region. The questions were sent to the candidates of the Liberal, Labor, Australian Democrats, the Greens, Family First and Socialist Alliance parties. [The full text of the letter is below].

The questions were as follows:

1. If elected, would you be willing to seek or support a move by the Australian Government to review the oil and gas treaty (CMATS) that exists between Australia and Timor Leste to ensure that the Timorese are given a fair share of the tax revenues from the oil and gas in the Timor Sea?

(Currently, Timor Leste receives less than its entitlement due to an agreement forced on it by the Howard Government. The Rudd and Gillard Governments have not changed this situation).

2. Would you support an Australian Government initiative to obtain justice for the five victims of Balibo and their families?

3. Are you prepared to support the cessation of all cooperation with the TNI (the Indonesian military) and KOPASSUS (the TNI division with the worst history of human rights abuses) until all officers accused of serious violations against human rights have been brought to justice?

4. Would you support the Australian Government raising this issue in the UN, asking all nations to halt all military cooperation with KOPASSUS and the TNI until all the war criminals in their ranks have been brought to justice through an international tribunal?

5. Would you support the Australian Government seeking a UN administered plebiscite in West Papua so that the people can determine their own political future with all TNI personnel removed from the territory beforehand to prevent the carnage and destruction that occurred in Timor Leste in 1999?

The parties that committed to agreeing to support all the actions in the questions were the Socialist Alliance and the Australian Democrats. Both have had a commitment over many years to justice and human rights for those who have suffered repression at the hands of KOPASSUS and the TNI.

While the Greens candidates did not answer all the questions, they do have policies to support changing the scandalous situation whereby Timor Leste receives less than its fair share of the profits from the oil and gas in the Timor Sea and are also committed to supporting the demand by Timor Leste that it have an oil refinery erected on its soil. The Greens have a policy to support self determination for the people of West Papua.

Family First did not answer any questions, but expressed friendship and support for Timor Leste.

The Associations received no response whatsoever from either of Australia’s two major political parties, the Liberal Party and the ALP. It is acknowledged that both parties have supported aid programs to Timor Leste, but remain silent on issues like bringing TNI criminals to justice, changing the scandalous oil and gas agreement with Timor Leste that sees profits that rightly belong to the poorest nation in the region being taken by the wealthiest.

Further, the two major parties have a long history of cooperation with the TNI, refusing to support independence for Timor Leste until 1999 and have refused to support a process for self determination for the people of West Papua. They are both committed to the Lombok Treaty with the Indonesian Republic, which opposes any breakup of the Indonesian Republic even though the TNI is committing gross human rights abuses in West Papua, Acheh and parts of the original Indonesia eg Maluku (the Moluccas).

The two associations in the next few days will disseminate the results of this exercise to its members, members of other human rights groups and the public at large and will urge them to put human rights in the region high on their priority when they vote on election day and give their preferences to the Socialist Alliance, the Australian Democrats and the Greens.

The Committees of both associations urge all Australians to lobby all political parties to ensure that the next parliament will have a greater commitment to international social justice and human rights than has been the case with previous parliaments.

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

Information Officer

Australia East Timor Friendship Association (SA) Inc

Phone: 08 83710480

Email: andyalcock@internode.on.net

Dave Arkins

Secretary Australia West Papua Association (SA) Phone: (08) 83454480 Email: dave-arkins@bigpond.com.au

………………………………………………………………………….

3 August 2010AUSTRALIA EAST TIMOR FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION SA INCPO Box 240 GOODWOOD SA 5034 AUSTRALIA Email: aetfa.sa@gmail.com AUSTRALIA WEST PAPUA ASSOCIATION – SA PO Box 29 KILKENNY SA 5009 AUSTRALIA E-mail: info@awpa-sa.org.au

3 August 2010

Name

Address

Dear

The Australia-East Timor Friendship Association of SA (AETFA) and the Australia West Papua Association SA (AWPA have longstanding concerns over injustices inflicted on

the peoples of Timor Leste and West Papua. We take the opportunity of the forthcoming election to seek the support of prospective members of the Australian Parliament to rectify a number of injustices which should be amenable to any Australian Government committed to human rights. AETFA and AWPA would be greatly encouraged if we could obtain a pledge from parliamentary candidates to seek or support government action on these injustices, should they succeed in being elected. One concern is the inequitable distribution of oil revenue from the Greater Sunrise project in the Timor Sea. Under duress, the Government of Timor Leste has agreed to a treaty with Australia which overrides the entitlement they would normally receive under international maritime law (the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea), and grants them only 50% of tax revenues from Greater Sunrise. Furthermore the Timor Leste Government is bound by the treaty not to seek reconsideration of maritime boundaries for fifty years. We would be greatly encouraged if candidates for the Australian Parliament would give a commitment to seek or support a revisiting of the Treaty on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS Treaty). We also seek the views of parliamentary candidates on achieving justice for the five Australian journalists murdered by the Indonesian military (TNI) in Balibo in 1975. After Australian Governments had repeatedly supported the absurd proposition that all five journalists were killed in crossfire, the facts have been clearly set out in the findings of the NSW coroner that Indonesian Special Forces deliberately killed the five Australian journalists at Balibo in 1975. The coroner recommended that federal authorities consider prosecuting two individuals. Although technically the decision on whether to prosecute lies with the Australian Federal Police (AFP) & the Public Prosecutor; it is virtually certain that the AFP will base any such decision on political advice. It is well documented that the TNI has been responsible for the deaths of at least 183,000 East Timorese between 1975 – 1999, hundreds of thousands of West Papuans since 1962, along with huge numbers of Achehnese and citizens of Indonesia itself since 1965. When the two major parties in this country are putting an emphasis on law and order in Australia, it seems logical that the same principle should apply to the peoples in our region as well, and that Australia should not support governments or organisations that commit genocide and other gross crimes against humanity. Furthermore, it is our belief that Australia should not stay quiet on the issue of seeking

justice for the East Timorese and West Papuan peoples over the multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the TNI and its most abusive element, KOPASSUS.

No senior Indonesian military personnel have ever been prosecuted in stark contrast to war-criminals in Bosnia, Rwanda or Cambodia. An International War Crimes Tribunal has yet to be set up to deal with the crimes by the TNI. Accordingly we would be grateful for your response to the following questions:

1. If elected, would you be willing to seek or support a move by the Australian Government to review the CMATS treaty to ensure that the people of Timor Leste are given a fair share of tax revenues from the oil and gas in the Timor Sea?

2. Would you support an Australian Government initiative to obtain justice for the five victims of Balibo and their families?

3. Are you prepared to support the cessation of all cooperation with the TNI and KOPASSUS until all officers accused of serious violations against human rights have been brought to justice?

4. Would you support the Australian Government raising this issue in the UN, asking all nations to halt all military cooperation with KOPASSUS and the TNI until all the war criminals in their ranks have been brought to justice through an international tribunal?

5. Would you support the Australian Government seeking a UN administered plebiscite in West Papua, with all TNI personnel removed from the territory to prevent the carnage and destruction that occurred in Timor Leste in 1999?

The Committees seek replies to these questions before the elections because we will be sending information to our members and other similar organisations that promote human rights and social justice, advising voters on the response of political parties to these questions. We want to be confident that the next parliament will have a greater commitment to international social justice and human rights than has been the case with previous parliaments.

Yours faithfully

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

Information Officer

Australia East Timor Friendship Association (SA) Inc

Phone: 08 83710480

Email: andyalcock@internode.on.net

Dave Arkins

Secretary Australia West Papua Association (SA)

 Phone: (08) 83454480

Email: dave-arkins@bigpond.com.au

TAXES ON SUPER PROFITS OF MINING COMPANIES

June 20th, 2010

 TAXES ON SUPER PROFITS OF MINING COMPANIES

Dear Companeros & Friends

 I recently received an email from the Minerals Council of Australia asking me to pressure the Federal Government to stop proceeding with the taxing of mining companies’ super profits.

I decided to tell them what a lot of ordinary Australians think of their stand over tactics instead.

You might be interested to know that since I sent my email to the MCA, I received an email from the Great Australian Survey today apologising for the advertising they ran on behalf of the Mining Council!

See the original email & the response below.

There must have been some strong reaction as they are trying to distance themselves from it (They will, of course, still take the money!!). Maybe, some other punters are expressing concern.

I think they thought I was a member of the GAS because that is to whom it is addressed. Of course, I am not a member of the Minerals Council. My only involvement to mining companies is through the super funds I have been a member of during my working life – even though I have nominated for green
type industries.

I am sure that this feedback will be conveyed to the MCA, so it is going to be interesting how it will respond.

In the meantime, we might like to encourage Rudd to extend the tax on super profits to banks and mining companies as well.

Maybe more of us should let the government & the large profiteers know what we think!                           

—– Original Message —–

From: andyalcock

To: The Great Australian Survey

Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:56 PM

Subject: Re: Minerals Council of Australia – a message from an ordinary Australian

Minerals Council of Australia

ATTENTION:    MITCH HOOKE

 

Thank you for your email regarding the tax on super profits from mining in this country.

 I cannot, however, support your view .

 It is true that the employees in the mining industry in this country produce a great deal of wealth.

Their hard work also provides super profits for mining companies and outrageously high wages for their senior managers. Much of this comes at a great sacrifice as the mining industry has one of the highest rates of work-related deaths of any industry in the country

 Ordinary taxpayers also have to pay the shortfall for the very low costs that mining companies pay for electricity and water.

 Yes, mining company taxes have helped pay for public schools, hospitals, roads and other services, but so do pay as you earn taxpayers in this country. Often their rate of tax is greater than the rate paid by mining companies.

 It should also be noted that Australia’s mineral resources are owned collectively by all Australians. Many mining companies operating in Australia are not Australian owned and the  super profits they make are taken out of the country.

 These resources should be used for the benefit of ordinary Australian citizens – especially those who have special needs. Also, more should be spent on more effective OHS&W systems to ensure that workers providing this wealth do not become diseased, injured or killed on the job as well as greater environmental safeguards.  

 Our national resources should not be used to further enrich people who are already multimillionaires or multibillionaires.

 Instead of the Minerals Council of Australia trying to coerce Australians into accepting a tax system which essentially means that the super wealthy are further being supported by those who are much poorer, its members should heed the important principles in the two following statements:

 * THE WORLD HAS ENOUGH TO FULFILL ALL OUR NEEDS BUT NOT ALL OUR GREEDS (Mahatma Ghandi) 

 * ONLY WHEN THE LAST TREE HAS DIED AND THE LAST RIVER BEEN POISONED AND THE LAST FISH BEEN CAUGHT WILL WE REALISE THAT WE CANNOTEAT   MONEY  (a Cree saying).

 Yours for a more socially just and an environmentally responsible Australia.

 Andrew (Andy) Alcock

 

 

 

MCA MESSAGE

Here’s a message to Canberra

Dear  ,

You might have heard about the Government’s new ‘Super Tax’ on Australia’s mining industry.

Half a million Australians rely on mining for their jobs and communities.

Their hard work creates Australia’s biggest exports and pays Australia’s biggest taxes – more than $80 billion over the past ten years.

Taxes from a strong mining industry have gone into our schools, hospitals and roads and kept our economy strong.

The growth of the mining industry has also boosted the retirement incomes of millions of Australians through direct shareholdings and superannuation.

However the new ‘Super Tax’ on mining puts this all at risk.

Watch the mining community’s message to Canberra now

Then you can use our website to take action.

It’s not too late for the Government to get this right.

Many thanks,The Keep Mining Strong team

—– Original Message —–

From: info@aussiesurveys.com.au

To: info@aussiesurveys.com.au

Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 3:58 PM

Subject: Letter to Members – Minerals Council of Australia campaign

Dear Members,

Recently we fowarded our members a campaign from the Minerals Council of Australia titled “Keep Mining Strong”. Following this send, we received several complaints regarding the nature of this campaign.

We do apologise to those we have inadvertently offended.

Attached to this email is our official response, please read this for further information..

Regards

The Great Australian Surveys Team

ATTACK ON AID SHIP BY THE ISRAELI MILITARY 31 May 2010

June 2nd, 2010

 

ATTACK ON AID SHIP BY THE ISRAELI MILITARY 31 May 2010

Like thousands of people around the world, I too have been outraged at the criminal attack by the Israeli military on a flotilla aid ships taking humanitarian supplies to Gaza where the people are in dire need.

In my view, both the attack and the blockade of Gaza are crimes against human rights.

Gaza’s water system is on the verge of collapse; the available drinking water is polluted. So little food is allowed in that children’s growth is being stunted.

Yesterday, I sent the letter below to Australia’s Foreign Affairs Minister and Attorney General criticising the weak Australian response to this outrage. 

Western democracies & the UN need to take a much stronger stance against the Zionist regime, which has always, since its inception, had a bellicose attitude to its neighbours in the ME.

Before It was established, Zionist terrorist gangs (Stern, Irgun and Haganah) carried out numerous terrorist actions against Palestinians to drive them from their homes and their lands.

I would urge all who read this website to sign petitions from the Jewish Voice for Peace & the other activist websites to bring as much pressure to bear as possible on Israel’s leaders.

En solidaridad

Andy

—– Original Message —–

From: andyalcock

To: R.McClelland.MP@aph.gov.au ; stephen.smith@aph.gov.au

Cc: info@canberra.mfa.gov.il

Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 12:14 PM

Subject: RE: ATTACK ON AID SHIP BY THE ISRAELI MILITARY

Mr Stephen Smith

Minister for Foreign Affairs

&

Mr R Mc Clelland

Attorney General

Australian Government

Dear Sirs

RE: ATTACK ON AID SHIP BY THE ISRAELI MILITARY

As an Australian citizen, who has spent much of his life working for human rights, I am writing to express my concern at the very inadequate response that Australia has made to Israel’s outrageous attack on an aid ship travelling to Gaza on 31 May 2010.

It seems that up to 20 people have been killed by the Israeli army on a civilian ship that was carrying sorely needed humanitarian aid to Palestinian civilians in Gaza. The vessel was in international waters and had 700 civilians supporting Palestinian human rights. This surely has to be viewed as a crime against humanity and should be identified as such.

Even if some militants on board attacked Israeli personnel first, as Israel claims, the reaction was totally over the top. Witnesses on board, however, claim that the Israeli soldiers fired first.

To put this event in perspective, I think we should compare this aid mission to Gaza with another peace mission that occurred in 1992 and compare the results. What resulted from that is in stark contrast to the behaviour of the Israeli military.

In March 1992, I participated in an international protest against Indonesia following the 1991 massacre of 270 East Timorese civilians at the Santa Cruz Cemetry, DIli by the Indonesian military. The name of the protest was “Missao paz em Timor” (Timor Peace Mission) and it was organised by Portuguese students and academics. An international group of 120 people from 21 countries boarded the Lusitania Expresso in Darwin with the intention of laying a wreath at the Santa Cruz cemetery in memory of those who died during the massacre.

 The aim of the trip was to alert the world to the genocide and the human rights abuses that were being committed against the people of East Timor by the brutal Indonesian military.

 Indonesian military spokespersons announced beforehand that we would be stopped from entering Indonesian waters, be stopped from landing in Dili, be refused permission to go to the Santa Cruz Cemetry and be blown out of the water. However, although the Lusitania Expresso was followed by a flotilla of Indonesian naval ships for two days, and at one stage, the Indonesian admiral threatened to take aggressive action, this did not happen.

 Most people would consider that the record of the Indonesian military is far worse than that of the Israeli military. It has committed genocide in Indonesia, West Papua, East Timor and Acheh.

 However, the Israeli military has also had a very tarnished record – forcing Palestinians off their lands, non judicial killings, the establishment of settlements on Palestinian lands, illegal invasions of Lebanon, bulldozing of Palestinian houses etc . Mainly due to the actions of the Israeli army. Israel now occupies about 80% of the territory that rightly belongs to Palestine. 

Surely, given this latest outrage, it is now time that countries claiming to be democratic take much firmer action against Israel. 

Australia should be moving in the UN that international sanctions should be taken against Israel until it: 

* allows there to be a full and independent UN investigation of the attack on the aid flotilla   and that those responsible for the murders of civilians are punished 

* ceases allowing Jewish settlements on Palestinian lands 

* ceases the construction of the Israeli West Bank barrier wall and

to demolish the parts already constructed as it is being used to annexe Palestinian land 

* stops its inhumane blockade of Gaza 

* removes its checkpoints and blockades located on Palestinian lands which constrain the human rights of Palestinians to free movement for work, to meet friends and relatives, attend medical and other necessary appointments

The sanctions should include: 

* removal of Israeli ambassadors

* cessation of all military cooperation with Israel

 * cessation of trade

 It should be noted that similar sanctions were taken against the apartheid regime in South Africa, which ironically, was supported by Israel despite the fact that its early leaders were pro Nazi.

 Just as Australian leaders eventually stopped their apologetic policy to the former Indonesian dictatorship on the issue of East Timor, now is the time to take such action against the state of Israel.

Yours sincerely

Andrew (Andy) Alcock