You are currently browsing the archives for the Uncategorized category.

THE MAMMOTH TASK AHEAD FOR PEOPLE OF GOODWILL: A MESSAGE TO FRIENDS AT UNITED TO END GENOCIDE [A GROUP SUPPORTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN SOUTH SUDAN]

January 10th, 2012
Dear Friends at United to End
Genocide,
I very much appreciate the good work you do to
assist the human rights of the people of Sudan.
I would like to respectfully disagree with the
observation that Tom made in his report, however.
“We know that when the United States Government is
paying attention and exercising its influence, progress can be
achieved”.
The fact is that US administrations frequently support the very regimes that you and other good people around the world are trying to expose because of their inhumanity and gross human rights abuses.
In doing some reading on the situation in Southern Sudan, I came across a report by Susan Gordon of the Huffington Post, who wrote the following on 3 January 2012, :
“At 3 a.m., I received an email from my colleague
and dear friend, Mohamed. Usually calm and measured in his communication, Mohamed raged in his email against the Obama administration and its Sudan envoy, Princeton Lyman, for their complicity in supporting the brutal regime of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, indicted by the International Criminal Court for genocide and crimes against humanity in Darfur. The subject line of the email was “U.S. Sudan policy is killing us.”
Many people had great hopes that the Obama Administration would make a difference for human rights, but this has not proved to be the case. He has done nothing to assist the plight of the Palestinians whose human and land rights are being violated every day by Israel.
In my region of the world, he has continued to assist the Indonesian military (TNI) despite the fact that it has committed genocide in East Timor, West Papua, Acheh and parts of Indonesia (eg Bali and Maliku provence).
In 1965, the CIA assisted Mahommed Suharto, the previous Indonesian dictator, to unseat the democratically elected government of President Sukarno. He remained in power for 33 long, corrupt and brutal years.
Amnesty International claimed that a half to one milion people were butchered by the TNI in the year afterwards with the full knowledge and blessing of the then US Administration and the CIA.
Some Indonesians inform me that the death toll was
nearer 3 million. Most of the victims were those supporting greater democracy and a fairer distribitution of resources. Ethnically, the Chinese and the Balinese suffered the most.
Barack Obama would know all of this as he spent a number of years living in Indonesia. He has done nothing to stop the support that the US gives to the TNI butchers.
Of course, Australian governments that endorse everything that US administrations do also support these people. Many in the SE Asian Pacific regions consider that the TNI is the worst terrorist organisation in our part of the world and that it can continue on its bloody way because the
US, Australia and some European governments allow it to do so.
US and Australian leaders continually preach about democracy, but continue to support dictatorships or get involved in unnecessary wars to get hold of resources of other nations, to increase the profits of their corporations or to install compliant regimes.
The fact is that the US is not a democracy as its governments are controlled by the Military/Industrial/Extreme Right Wing Complex (M/I/ERW/C). Dwight Eisenhower, before he retired as US President in 1961, warned the US people to beware of the Military Industrial complex because he had the foresight to see that this was going to be a very powerful and undemocratic force.
Since then, many extreme right wing organisations have worked to strengthen the power of this complex even further eg right wing
Republicans (and Democrats), the Tea Party, The Family, Moral Rearmament (some quite pro Nazi in outlook) etc and they provide an almost insurmountable force in relation to the decisions of US administrations.
However, to prevent US administrations (and the compliant governments like Australia) from bowing to the dictates of the M/I/ERW/C, more must be done to loosenthe strangle hold it has on decision-making processes.
The supreme war criminal Robert McNamara was never elected by the US people to high office. He was appointed by the Kennedy Administration from the Ford corporation and was given great powers to escalate the US War in Vietnam to an incredible extent. Three million Vietnamese died, their infrastructure was massively destroyed and their environment was greatly
contaminated because of this criminal megalomaniac and the US presidents (and other political leaders) who listened to him.
As we fight for the human rights of the victims of human rights abuses, we also need to confront the political forces that help to install the dictatorships that carry out the crimes against humanity.
And we need to look very critically look at our political structures that have given US and western politicians so much power to affect the politics of other
nations.
If we do not do this, certain individuals will always be able to get away with making more people suffer because of their greed and lust for power. And those of us who are struggling for social justice, human rights and a safer environment will be condemned to continue in this struggle forever.
Yours for peace, social justice, human rights and environmental responsibility
A La Lucha Continua!
Andrew (Andy) Alcock
Forestville
South
Australia
AUSTRALIA

A MESSAGE OF SOLIDARITY TO ETAN ON THE OCCASION OF ITS 20TH ANNIVERSARY

December 13th, 2011
—– Original Message —–

From: “andyalcock” <andyalcock@internode.on.net>
To: “ETAN” <etan@etan.org>; “Noam
Chomsky” <
chomsky@MIT.EDU>
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 12:35
PM
Subject: Re: A MESSAGE OF SOLIDARITY TO ETAN ON THE
OCCASION OF ITS 20TH ANNIVERSARY

Dear Compainheros John, Charles, Noam and other members of ETAN

I would like to add my congratulations to all ETAN activists on the occasion
of your 20th anniversary and also to reaffirm our solidarity with you.

As an activist in one of the Australian solidarity groups, I know about the
great contribution of ETAN to the existence of the RDTL today. I am a member  of the Australia East Timor Friendship Association of South Australia Inc (AETFA), which was originally, the Campaign for an Independent East Timor, South Australia Inc (CIET).

On 28 May this year, our group celebrated its 36th anniversary with about 80
young people from TL who are undergoing secondary and tertiary education in  Adelaide.

 

It was a very joyous occasion to celebrate both our anniversary with the 9th
anniversary of an independent TL.

Noam, in his message, has stressed the importance of the work of ETAN and  the other solidarity groups around the world as a contributing factor to
East Timor’s victory over Indonesia and the gaining of its independence.

During the late 1990s, Charles Scheiner introduced two submissions that we
made to the UN to appeal for it to make greater efforts for the East
Timorese. During the celebrations for independence in Dili in 2002, some of
our members were fortunate enough to meet him at the Xanana Resource Centre  at a function for solidarity groups and thank him.

However, we can take nothing away from the tenacity and the courage of the
members of FRETILIN, FALINTIL and RENETIL who fought against overwhelming  odds in their struggle against the TNI.

It was crucial that there were people actively promoting independence for
Timor and demanding the withdrawal of the TNI. This helped the progressive
forces within the UN to prevent it from ratifying the illegal Indonesian
occupation and to demand that the TNI withdraw. I believe that it is a
great  tragedy that in the case of West Papua, the UN ratified the phoney
Act of  Free Choice in that country in 1969. As a result, these people have
suffered the brutality of the TNI for even longer than the East
Timorese.

The international awareness of the Timor issue which was achieved by the
East Timor solidarity groups, I believe, was also a factor in the minds of
leading Indonesian decision makers, when, after the Asian economic meltdown  and the fall of the dictator Suharto, they were forced to allow a
plebiscite for independence. Their hands were forced when they were
confronted with a national economy that was in a dreadful state because of
the huge amounts being spent on the TNI to supress people in East Timor,
West Papua, Acheh and parts of Indonesia itself together with the massive
corruption that had been allowed by the dictatorship.

I also agree with Noam that now there is an independent Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste, we need to continue our strong advocacy for the pursuit of justice and compensation for the victims of the TNI barbarity throughout its occupation. Several Australian governments were complicit in supporting the TNI’s illegal occupation because of their unquestioning support of US  administrations. In addition, of course, the Howard government forced an unfair agreement on the fledgeling RDTL government on how the oil and gas  resources in the Timor Sea should be shared. With such a small population,  the RDTL is not in a good position to push these issues with the current  Indonesian and Australian governments.

We have made demands that the Australian government refuse to continue
aiding and arming the TNI while the Indonesian government does nothing to
bring the war criminals in its ranks to justice, does nothing about
compensating the victims of the TNI and refuses to withdraw from West Papua.

Further, we have lobbied a number of Australian politicians to also to call
on the UN to instigate an international ban on all aid to the TNI until these
conditions are met. We also cooperate with the Australia West Papua
Association on these issues.

The Australian politicians we have approached always use the excuse that the RDTL government is not making these demands.

This is the reason why we have to continue the important advocacy role as
well as raising money to support projects to assist Timor Leste to rebuild
and redevelop.

We hope to continue our working together on these import campaigns with you.

Congratulations and thank you for all the valuable work you have done over
the past 20 years to contribute to peace, social justice and human rights in
East Timor and the Asia Pacific region.

The major terrorist organisation preventing this in our region is the TNI
and both of our governments support it while espousing their promotion of
human rights.

In closing, I should mention that progressive people in Adelaide were  excited to have Noam come to Adelaide to deliver the annual Edward Said
Memorial Lecture organised by the University of Adelaide and the Australian
Friends of Palestine Association on 5 November. The numbers attending were  so great that the organisers had to hire the Adelaide Town Hall which can  accommodate over 1000 people. Even the premier of South Australia was in  attendance.

Noam was also in Australia to receive the Sydney Peace Prize, which so many believe was thoroughly deserved because of his great work to
promote peace, justice and human rights.

Warm regards

Viva Timor Leste!

Viva Papua Barat!

Viva Solidaridad International!

Andrew (Andy) Alcock
Information Officer

Australia East Timor Friendship Association (SA) Inc

Phone: 61 8 83710480

Email:

andyalcock@internode.on.net

—– Original Message —–
From: “ETAN”
<
etan@etan.org>
To: <
etan@etan.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 5:05 PM
Subject: A
message from Noam Chomsky on ETAN’s 20th Anniversary

Noam
Chomsky

December 2011

Dear Friends,

It is 20 years since a
small group of activists founded what is now the
East Timor and Indonesia
Action Network (ETAN), and I have been supporting
it since the beginning. I
am writing to you today to urge you to join me
in that
support.

Twenty years ago, on November 12, Indonesian troops marched up
and opened
fire on a peaceful pro-independence demonstration at the Santa
Cruz
cemetery in Dili, the capital of what was then known as East Timor.
More
than 270 young Timorese were murdered in the most publicized of a
great
many shocking atrocities during the Indonesian invasion and
annexation.
The eyewitness accounts of western journalists broke through
the silence
and hypocrisy of the media, bringing the first news of the
occupation to
many.

Among those inspired to act were the founders
of the East Timor Action
Network. A small group of activists began to meet,
and in the first of
many demonstrations, a few dozen concerned people
picketed in front of the
Indonesian Mission to the United Nations in New
York City on December 10,
1991, International Human Rights Day. Outraged by
the U.S. government’s
complicity in the oppression of the East Timorese,
they created an
impressive national organization committed to supporting
East Timor’s
right to self-determination. Quickly, grassroots pressure
persuaded the
U.S. Congress to terminate taxpayer-funded training for
Indonesian
soldiers in the United States, the first of many legislative
victories
which eventually moved Washington from supporting to opposing the
illegal
occupation.

I have long supported East Timor’s
self-determination. Even before
Indonesia’s 1975 invasion, I called for the
right of the East Timorese to
control their own destiny. I welcomed ETAN’s
founding and admired its
effective grassroots organizing. I am told that I
was the organization’s
first donor. That contribution was one of the best
investments I have ever
made for political and social change. Without
ETAN’s efforts, East Timor
might not yet be free.

Since then I have
continued to support ETAN. I hope you will too. Please
help ETAN celebrate
20 years of dedicated and effective activism and
continue its important
work.

—-
Throughout the 1990s, ETAN kept up the pressure. In 1999,
when the East
Timorese finally were able to vote on their political future,
the crimes
were escalating once again. ETAN had a significant role in
pressing
President Clinton to inform the Indonesian generals in September
that the
game was over, at which point they quickly withdrew.

East
Timor is now the independent Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste, but
ETAN
remains tenacious in the pursuit of justice for the victims of the
Santa
Cruz massacre and the entire Indonesian occupation. It remains
active in
highlighting the complicity of U.S. government officials in the
oppression
of the people of East Timor, West Papua and elsewhere in the
Indonesian
archipelago including the still-active Henry Kissinger, who
gave a green
light to the invasion of East Timor. ETAN understands that
there cannot be
peace without justice.

While East Timor is now an independent nation, it
still struggles for
genuine self-determination under the pressures of the
global economic
system. ETAN is currently coordinating a campaign with
Timor-Leste’s
Movement against Debt opposing the taking out of onerous
loans by
currently debt-free Timor. A statement signed by 137
organizations
worldwide argued, “Rather than repeat the mistakes of other
developing
countries that have struggled with debt during recent decades,
Timor-Leste
should learn from their experiences, which often inflicted
great hardships
on their people.”Nearly a thousand people have signed
ETAN’s
<
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/support-a-debt-free-timor-leste.html>petition
expressing similar concerns.

In 2005, ETAN changed
its name to the East Timor and Indonesia Action
Network to emphasize its
ongoing work for human rights and democracy in
Indonesia as well as East
Timor. In the past, U.S. engagement with
Indonesia’s security forces has
encouraged those forces’ most abusive
behavior. ETAN is opposing the Obama
administration’s efforts to re-engage
with the Indonesian military’s
notorious Kopassus special forces. It
continues to be a voice of reason,
criticizing the administration’s
reluctance to address ongoing human rights
violations and escalating
oppression in West Papua and against religious
minorities. ETAN also holds
corporations responsible for their role in
human rights abuses and
recently joined Occupy Phoenix and union activists
in picketing at the
mining giant Freeport MacMoRan’s headquarters,
supporting striking
mineworkers in West Papua.

If it can find the
resources, ETAN plans to coordinate an observer mission
for next year’s
presidential and parliamentary elections in East Timor, as
they did in 1999,
2001 and 2007. Experienced, nonpartisan international
observers will help
consolidate democracy at this critical moment for the
still young
country.

ETAN’s work remains essential, but it can only do its work with
the active
and generous support of people like you, who believe in human
rights and
in the right to self-determination, justice and accountability,
and in
social and economic justice for the people of East Timor and
Indonesia.

I can think of few groups that have done so much with such
limited
resources. For most of its 20 years, ETAN has worked with an
extremely
limited budget. In recent years, ETAN’s annual budget has been
less than
$55,000. With your help, we can put ETAN on a firmer footing for
the
future. Please give generously in this anniversary year. In doing so,
you
can help strengthen ETAN to meet the challenges of the coming
years.

Thank you for joining me in supporting ETAN and its invaluable
work.

Sincerely,

Noam
Chomsky
———————————-

 

GILLARD GIVES WAR PLANES TO INDONESIA

November 26th, 2011
The Letters Editor
The Advertiser
GPO Box 339
ADELAIDE SA 5001
 Dear Sir/Madam
 RE: LETTER TO THE EDITOR
 - NO AID TO THE INDONESIAN MILITARY
Many Australians who give a priority to human rights would have been dismayed to read that Prime Minister Gillard will give four RAAF Hercules to Indonesia – a gift worth $30 million (“Gillard’s gift of four war planes”, The Advertiser
21.11.2011).
At the same time she tells us that we have had our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan as a contribution to the US war against terrorism.
 The fact is that the Indonesian military (TNI) has been the strongest
force for terrorism in our region for nearly the past 50 years. Since the early
1960s it has been responsible for torture, rape, murder and genocide in West
Papua, East Timor, Acheh and Indonesia itself. No TNI leaders have ever been
brought to justice and none of the victims of their crimes have ever been
compensated.
 These crimes against humanity are continuing in West Papua which the TNI still occupies with great brutality.
It is highly inappropriate for us to be rewarding the TNI by giving such gifts even though the report claims that the planes will be used for disaster relief.
 During the Acheh tsunami in 2004, many aid organisations had to rely on the TNI to transport aid to victims and to resettle those at risk. It is a matter of fact
that the TNI charged highly inflated fees for the use of their vehicles and
aircraft and sold much of the aid for profit. Apart from its contribution to
regional terrorism, it is a very corrupt organisation.
Such gifts may help smoothe over strained Indonesian-Australian relations caused by the live cattle ban and they may hasten the chances of early release of Australian citizens who face drug charges in Indonesia. However, they will do nothing for human rights in our region.
 If our leaders really care about human rights, they should be demanding that there will be no military aid or cooperation with the TNI until all the war criminals in its ranks are brought to justice, compensation has been paid to all its victims and its troops have been withdrawn from West Papua. 
Yours sincerely
Andrew (Andy) Alcock

ASIO & CONCERNS ABOUT FASCIST GROUPS IN AUSTRALIA

October 15th, 2011
Mr Des Ryan
Editor
InDaily

 

4 Cinema Place (off Vaughan Place)
ADELAIDE SA
5000

 

indaily@solsticemedia.com.au

 Dear Mr Ryan

RE: LETTER TO THE EDITOR 

 ASIO & CONCERNS ABOUT FASCIST GROUPS IN AUSTRALIA

I was interested to read the article, Fascist threat: ASIO, (InDaily 12.10.2011) about ASIO’s concern that fascist groups may pose a threat to
Australia. Evidently, in an  assessment contained in the Australian Security
Intelligence Organisation’s annual report to Parliament, it claimed that current right-wing extremist groups, drawing inspiration from overseas, may one day spawn an Anders Breivik-style terrorist attack in Australia.   Breivik is the Norwegian terrorist who, while describing himself as a Christian and a ”modern-day crusader”, killed 77 people during a bombing in Oslo and a shooting rampage at a Norwegian camp for teenagers in July this year.

It is good to know that ASIO is now taking an interest in these groups with a view to protecting Australians from their activities. This has not always been the case, however.

Some may remember the First Hope Royal Commission of 1974, which was undertaken by Justice Robert Hope, to inquire into into the activities of ASIO.


It should be remembered that this Commission was largely prompted by ASIO’s relationship with the pro Nazi Croatian group, the Ustashi. During World War 2, Ustashi, the wartime brown shirt organisation of the Nazi puppet dictator, Ante Pavelic, committed many atrocities on behalf of the Nazis in Yugoslovia.

During the US war in Vietnam, young Australian-born Ustashi members were able to receive military training in Australian army camps. Some of them were used to commit terrorist acts in the former Yugoslavia in the 1970s and 1980s

In the late sixties and early seventies, the Ustashi conducted the most
serious terrorist campaign in Australian history, with bombings in Sydney in
1967, 1969 and 1972, Canberra in 1969, Melbourne in 1970 and 1972. It was shown
that while Ustashi’s activities were discussed openly in the Croatian
press, ASIO was busily monitoring ordinary citizens in the peace, social justice human rights and women’s movements and and took no action whatsoever against these fully-fledged terrorists.

Due to ASIO’s refusal to cooperate with the government of the day, the
Australian Attorney General, Lionel Murphy, was compelled to raid ASIO’s HQ with the Commonwealth Police to seize the relevant documentation.

The Hope Commission made it clear that ASIO had been largely unaccountable. It cooperated very closely with Bob
Santamaria’s right wing National Civic Council and had been used as a political tool by the Liberal-Country Party coalition during its long period of office from 1949 to 1972.

In particular, Justice Hope noted that ASIO’s “Special Projects” section largely kept files on left-leaning Australians. Helen Garner, one of Australia’s most famous authors was on file. Her only “crime” was that in 1972, she was a prominent feminist  It appears that she had done nothing more than put her details on a feminist contact list.

Later, Mr Bob Greenwood, QC, a former head of the Special Investigations Unit
into war criminals in Australia established by the Hawke government, admitted
that a number of alleged Nazi war criminals were used by ASIO to spy on ethnic
communities.

It is to be hoped that ASIO from now on, will maintain as a top priority what
it was meant to do in the first place and that is to prevent Australians from
terrorism – not spy on innocent Australian citizens.

Yours sincerely

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION FOR ABORIGINAL & TORRES STRAIT (September 2011)

September 19th, 2011

CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION FOR ABORIGINAL & TORRES STRAIT
ISLANDER PEOPLE

Dear Friends

I was recently contacted by the GenerationOne Team
of
You me unity. YMU
is the campaign to update our constitution to recognise
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and culture for the benefit of all
Australians
The Australian Constitution is supposed to be the
basis for our laws and political system. However, the Australian Constitution
was written by people who had their own vested interests in  in 1901 and a lot
has changed since then.

 

Nowadays, many Australians would be surprised to know that the Constitution
still includes the possibility for discrimination based on your race, and
ignores Australia’s first peoples and their role as custodians of the world’s
oldest continuing culture.

The Australian people have the power to update the Constitution through a
referendum so that it better reflects our shared values.

In light of this, the Australian Government announced the membership of
an Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander peoples in December 2010, following nominations by the public. The
Panel consists of a range of respected and accomplished individuals, including
Indigenous and community leaders, constitutional experts and parliamentary
members. It was appointed by the
Government to consult with the people and lead a nationwide discussion on the
issue.

The Panel is co-chaired by Professor Patrick Dodson and Mr Mark Leibler
AC.

The Expert Panel has led a wide-ranging national public
consultation and engagement program throughout 2011. It will report its findings
to the Government by December 2011. By December 2011, after a period of
consideration, discussion and consultation with all Australians, the Panel will
advise the government about the options for formally recognising Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Constitution.

We are all invited to make our own submissions to support
the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the
Constitution.

For more details, go to the following
website:

http://us2.campaign-archive2.com/?u=66d7369f19f66192ec26739d2&id=2d9ef4299b&e=b84740085b
The submissions do not have to be very long. I
wrote mine after reading others that are on the website.
Please support this campaign which ends at the end
of September 2011.
For a fairer and more equal Australia.
Andy Alcock
MY SUBMISSION:
It is a great national shame that Australia
has yet to recognise our indigenous people since their land was taken from them by conquest over 200 years ago.
Our constitution should be re-written to ensure that Aborigines are mentioned and that the sentiments of the Rudd Government are also included.
The fact is that the Australian Constitution was written by people who had their own vested interests. It needs to be overhauled so that it can reflect the realities of the Australian nation today and that it can be a statement that is in tune with the feelings of ordinary Australians and their belief in a “fair go”.
John Howard could have done this during his
term of office, but he was too busy resisting what he saw as the “black armband of history”. This is, of course, the “white gag of history” and an attempt to deny the acts of genocide committed by the first British invaders of
Australia.
Let us give our Aboriginal people the recognition that they deserve in a new, updated and relevant Australian Constitution. We should also demand that Australian governments do more to assist Aboriginal communities to overcome the social disadvantages that they have suffered since the first Europeans arrived.

New Matilda Mar 2011: Does West Papua Have A Publicity Problem?

September 8th, 2011
New Matilda Mar 2011

Does West Papua Have A Publicity Problem?

By Marni Cordell

Protests in North Africa have sparked
renewed interest in citizens’ rights – and media coverage has helped. So why do
we still overlook serious government oppression just a few hundred kilometres to
our north? Marni Cordell reports

“In my opinion, what’s happening in West Papua amounts to
genocide, both physical and cultural,” says Akihisa Matsuno, a professor at the
Osaka School of International Public Policy who specialises in Indonesia. “At
the very least we have to say this is a crime against humanity in terms of a
systematic annihilation of the civilian population that is intentional,
widespread and ongoing.”

“But Indonesia is different from Burma, which is a sort of
pariah state, or North African countries which we know are despotic,” he told
New Matilda. “In Indonesia the president looks okay, he’s not a dictator, he’s
just an ordinary president heading an ordinary developing country, so it is more
difficult for people to condemn him.”

Professor Matsuno visited Sydney last week to speak at
Comprehending West Papua, a conference organised by the Centre for Peace and
Conflict Studies at Sydney University and attended by many of the prominent
figures in West Papua’s long-running campaign for independence.

Despite the renewed interest in rights abuses on the other side
of the globe, the conference attracted very little media attention. And yet it’s
a lack of international attention that Matsuno believes has allowed the
situation in West Papua to reach breaking point.

“West Papua is one of the very few areas in world where foreign
mass media — or even domestic mass media — have no access. The others are
probably Tibet and Xinjiang in China. And this is happening at a time when free
media is flourishing in other parts of Indonesia, so people really aren’t aware
of what’s going on there.”

“This is why the world doesn’t know how unsustainable the
situation on ground in West Papua really is, and in turn why the Indonesian
Government doesn’t want the media to have access — because the Indonesian
Government is afraid for the world to know.”

In a thought-provoking presentation, Professor Matsuno told
conference delegates that those calling for independence in West Papua should be
publicising the dire situation in the province right now to support their
claims, rather than revisiting past injustices and drawing on international
covenants that protect the universal right to self-determination.

“Usually arguments for independence in West Papua address the
past issues, and these arguments are still valid and correct,” he said. “But I
think we have to add a new dimension to the argument, and that is the
unsustainability of the situation in West Papua right now: the human rights
abuses, the lack of economic development, the malnutrition, HIV/AIDS and more.”

“If you talk about the past 40 years then the situation with
human rights in West Papua is really serious, it is one of the biggest tragedies
in our time. We don’t know exactly how many people have died — some people say
300,000, some half a million — but the fact that we don’t know is neglectful
in itself.”

International opinion on self-determination is changing, Matsuno
told the conference, and this can be seen clearly in recent international
examples. Kosovo’s secession from Serbia, for example, was seen not as a right,
but as a remedy to an unsustainable situation. Matsuno said this is an
important distinction.

“In retrospect, we must say that … the territorial integrity of
Serbia was neglected [and that] the protection of the people in Kosovo
apparently had more weight”, he said.

Matsuno believes this is highly relevant to Indonesia’s claims
to West Papua. “If this interpretation is right, the world now tends to see the
issue of self-determination not in terms of its original legality alone but more
in terms of contemporary situations of functioning morality within the state
borders,” he said.

“I think the implications of this for West Papua are rather
clear if this is right.”

However, he warns a major obstacle to international support for
West Papuan self-determination will be the history of UN
involvement in the issue. “Historically, the UN
recognised the incorporation of West Papua into Indonesia, it is a stain on the
UN’s record, so it is very difficult to get the issue
back on the political agenda in the UN because everyone
feels guilty,” he said. “If there is no strong movement like that happening in
North Africa now, it will be difficult to get it back on the agenda.”

From within West Papua, support for independence is widespread
and resistance to Indonesia’s rule takes many forms, from armed guerilla-style,
to the simple act of raising the Morning Star flag, an offence that carries a
jail term of up to 20 years.

“When I travelled there a number of years ago I felt very strong
support for independence among the people — from the young to the very old,”
says Matsuno. “Even when I spoke to public figures in universities or
government, they couldn’t say explicitly [that they supported it], but I could
feel they were so frustrated with the situation on the ground.”

“The real obstacle to getting the situation in West Papua back
on the public agenda is that no one knows just how bad the situation really is.
Ideally we, the international community, should pay much more attention, but
that is too abstract when people don’t really know what’s going on there.”

“West Papuans are losing the information war,” says Matsuno, and
by blocking all media access, Indonesia is clearly winning. As such, they and
their supporters need to “step up efforts to get information out in any way
possible”, and make use of social media to disseminate and organise.

“We should set up internet connections for example, encourage
Facebook and Twitter — all of the new technology we are witnessing in North
Africa at the moment.”

“Strategically, we all need to think about how we can win this
information battle.”

Does West Papua Have A Publicity Problem? - a reply By Andy Alcock

With respect to New Matilda, the title of this
article, which raises many pertinent issues, asks the wrong question.
The title sounds as thought the West Papuans are being
blamed for the problems they face. They are the victims here and have been for
49 years.
They have been badly let down by the UN and those
nations that claim to be democratic and fair while profiting mightily from their
plunder of West Papua’s resources.
I think a more relevant questions that get to the gist
of the problem faced by the West Papuans are:
Why Does the US, Australia & Other Western Nations
Support Genocide in West Papua?
or
Why Do Indonesian Apologists Claim that It is
Democratic when the Real Power in the Country is in the Hands of the Genocidal
and Ultra Corrupt TNI?
or
Why Does the World Consider that it is Morally OK for
the Crimes of the TNI War Criminals to be Ignored While they Continue to Commit
their Crimes in WP?
US administrations were heavily inolved in the
occupation of both West Papua and East Timor and the bloody overthrow of Sukarno
by Suharto.
The US and compliant states like Australia, which
accept every unacceptable action that US administrations take without question,
allow the TNI to carry on its merry and bloody way.
Who cares about the human rights of the West Papuans
when there is money to be made out of their resources by the big corporations?
And who provides the security for the facilities these
organisations have in West Papua and the country’s resources they are
?
People who ask such questions are are obviously not
acting in the national interest..
It is up to us, who know what is happening, to push
the issue more strongly to promote their just cause for
independence.
March 03, 2011

MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY

June 3rd, 2011
 
 
 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 12:58 PM
   

Mr Des Ryan

Editor

InDaily

4 Cinema Place(off Vaughan Place)
ADELAIDE SA 5000

indaily@solsticemedia.com.au

  

Dear Mr Ryan

  
RE:    LETTER TO THE EDITOR:  CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY & ROBYN JURY
  
 Thank you for printing the harrowing story of Robyn Jury whose life has been adversely affected because of her occupational exposure to chemicals
(InDaily 23.5.2011).
  
It was fortuitous that you included the article on your website when you did as May is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) Awareness Month and on the day the article appeared, SA’s MCS Task Force staged a rally on the steps of Parliament House, Adelaide, to highlight the problems faced by those people who have become hypersensitive to certain chemicals because of their long history of chemical exposure.
 
 
Robyn’s story reads like a classic case of MCS and it is characteristic of many of the case histories that I have have encountered during 25 years of working as an OH&S officer  and assisting employees who have been exposed to chemicals in their workplaces. There are many people in the same situation as Robyn. Often they are not believed , nor are they treated sympathetically by their employers, who did not provide them with safe working environments in the first place. They are then  confronted with officers at WorkCover who are also unsympathetic and who put obstacles in their way when they seek compensation.
 
It is important for people to realise that MCS sufferers experience great debilitation and a much reduced quality of life. Their condition is also associated with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Frequently, they cannot be in places that contain chemical fumes eg hospitals, pharmacies, the sections of shops with cleaning products, areas where there are many individuals wearing cosmetics (perfume, after shave lotion, shampoos etc) or where people are smoking, rooms that have just been painted, chemical plants, aerial spraying of pesticides or weedicides or heavy traffic etc. Basically, their health is threatened when they are exposed to emissions of toxic gases or fumes.
 
The body’s auto-immune system is affected when people are exposed to these examples of chemical pollution. However, the effects on individuals differ. Some sufferers experience nausea and/or vomiting. In others asthma attacks are triggered. And in some other cases, the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord) is affected and the sufferer may experience malfunctioning of the neurological system. For example, one person I know who is very sensitive to the solvents in paint walked into her office after it had been painted. That evening when returning home, she lost her way.  Her specialist advised that she be transferred to another worksite. Eventually, this happened, but only after a fight with the management, who tried to terminate her employment..
 
Research in the US and elsewhere shows an alarming increase in the numbers of those who are suffering from chemical sensitivity. Many of these people, like Robyn, consider themselves to be allergic to the 21st century.
 
When it is considered that well over 100,000 chemicals are used in workplaces and that chemical and agricultural industries release huge amounts of toxic substances chemicals into our environment, is it any wonder?
 

In SA, the Task Force on MCS , under the convenorship of Peter Evans, is trying to promote safer use of chemicals, give support to those who suffer from MCS and trying to get members of the public to understand the problem. Peter, is a qualified nurse who cannot work because of his sensitivity to the host of chemicals used in hospitals.
 
A few years ago, this very active group was successful in lobbying SA MLCs and there was a Parliamentary inquiry into chemical use in SA, the findings of which were released in 2005. Unfortunately, the recommended actions did not go far enough.
 
To care for the environment and to ensure that less people end up suffering like Robyn and Peter, we need to demand less use of chemical products at work and in the environment, safer alternatives to the more toxic ones, safer work environments for their use and a greater responsibility in the way they are used.

  
 
Andrew (Andy) Alcock
  
  
  
           
 
 
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 
further info:
 
 
 
An MCS disability access rally will be held at Adelaide’s Parliament House on

Monday, 23 May, at 12 noon.
 
The rally calls on the state government to develop practical MCS disability access strategies for all
public health care services in South Australia, commencing with the immediate introduction of
controls on the use of perfume and aftershave in public health care.

This proposal is consistent with the Recommendations arising from the

2005 Parliamentary Inquiry into MCS in SA.
 
It is also consistent with the state government’s guidelines for the care of hospital in-patients with MCS
 
And with the state government’s disability access guidelines for government owned buildings.
 
And with the Australian Human Rights Commission chemical sensitivity guidelines
for disability access to premises
 
And with numerous MCS disability access policies that have been in place

for several decades in Canada and the United States.
 
And with similar international policies for fragrance controls in health care services.
 

 

In 2008 a Department of Health population survey reported that 1% of South Australians have been medically diagnosed with MCS, with 16% reporting unusual sensitivities to common chemicals.
The survey concluded that many people in the larger group had
chronic symptoms more consistent with MCS.
 
Similar international studies show that around
2% of industrialised populations can no longer work due to MCS,
with up to 6% or more medically diagnosed with the illness.
 
Public health care services cannot continue to ignore the
complex medical and disability accommodation
needs of people with MCS.
Please come along to the rally and show your support for the many thousands of people in
South Australia who are seriously disabled by chemical sensitivity. 
 
A flier for this event is attached together with a poster from the MCS Society of Australia
calling for national MCS hospital guidelines.
 
Out of respect for the disability needs of people with MCS,
please refrain from wearing perfume, aftershave, essential oils or other
highly fragranced products to this event.
 
Regards
Peter Evans RN(formerly) Grad Dip Health Counselling
Convenor
SA Task Force on MCS

 

May 31st, 2011

—– Original Message —–
From: andyalcock
To: andyalcock
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 6:17 PM
Subject: guardian.co.uk, Sunday 29 May 2011 22.00 BST: Worst ever carbon emissions leave climate on the brink

Worst ever carbon emissions leave climate on the brink
Exclusive: Record rise, despite recession, means 2C target almost out of reach

Fiona Harvey, Environment correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 29 May 2011 22.00 BST

Economic recession has failed to curb rising emissions, undermining hope of keeping global warming to safe levels Photograph: Dave Reede/All Canada Photos/Corbis
Greenhouse gas emissions increased by a record amount last year, to the highest carbon output in history, putting hopes of holding global warming to safe levels all but out of reach, according to unpublished estimates from the International Energy Agency.

The shock rise means the goal of preventing a temperature rise of more than 2 degrees Celsius – which scientists say is the threshold for potentially “dangerous climate change” – is likely to be just “a nice Utopia”, according to Fatih Birol, chief economist of the IEA. It also shows the most serious global recession for 80 years has had only a minimal effect on emissions, contrary to some predictions.

Last year, a record 30.6 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide poured into the atmosphere, mainly from burning fossil fuel – a rise of 1.6Gt on 2009, according to estimates from the IEA regarded as the gold standard for emissions data.

“I am very worried. This is the worst news on emissions,” Birol told the Guardian. “It is becoming extremely challenging to remain below 2 degrees. The prospect is getting bleaker. That is what the numbers say.”

Professor Lord Stern of the London School of Economics, the author of the influential Stern Report into the economics of climate change for the Treasury in 2006, warned that if the pattern continued, the results would be dire. “These figures indicate that [emissions] are now close to being back on a ‘business as usual’ path. According to the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's] projections, such a path … would mean around a 50% chance of a rise in global average temperature of more than 4C by 2100,” he said.

“Such warming would disrupt the lives and livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people across the planet, leading to widespread mass migration and conflict. That is a risk any sane person would seek to drastically reduce.”

Birol said disaster could yet be averted, if governments heed the warning. “If we have bold, decisive and urgent action, very soon, we still have a chance of succeeding,” he said.

The IEA has calculated that if the world is to escape the most damaging effects of global warming, annual energy-related emissions should be no more than 32Gt by 2020. If this year’s emissions rise by as much as they did in 2010, that limit will be exceeded nine years ahead of schedule, making it all but impossible to hold warming to a manageable degree.

Emissions from energy fell slightly between 2008 and 2009, from 29.3Gt to 29Gt, due to the financial crisis. A small rise was predicted for 2010 as economies recovered, but the scale of the increase has shocked the IEA. “I was expecting a rebound, but not such a strong one,” said Birol, who is widely regarded as one of the world’s foremost experts on emissions.

John Sauven, the executive director of Greenpeace UK, said time was running out. “This news should shock the world. Yet even now politicians in each of the great powers are eyeing up extraordinary and risky ways to extract the world’s last remaining reserves of fossil fuels – even from under the melting ice of the Arctic. You don’t put out a fire with gasoline. It will now be up to us to stop them.”

Most of the rise – about three-quarters – has come from developing countries, as rapidly emerging economies have weathered the financial crisis and the recession that has gripped most of the developed world.

But he added that, while the emissions data was bad enough news, there were other factors that made it even less likely that the world would meet its greenhouse gas targets.

• About 80% of the power stations likely to be in use in 2020 are either already built or under construction, the IEA found. Most of these are fossil fuel power stations unlikely to be taken out of service early, so they will continue to pour out carbon – possibly into the mid-century. The emissions from these stations amount to about 11.2Gt, out of a total of 13.7Gt from the electricity sector. These “locked-in” emissions mean savings must be found elsewhere.

“It means the room for manoeuvre is shrinking,” warned Birol.

• Another factor that suggests emissions will continue their climb is the crisis in the nuclear power industry. Following the tsunami damage at Fukushima, Japan and Germany have called a halt to their reactor programmes, and other countries are reconsidering nuclear power.

“People may not like nuclear, but it is one of the major technologies for generating electricity without carbon dioxide,” said Birol. The gap left by scaling back the world’s nuclear ambitions is unlikely to be filled entirely by renewable energy, meaning an increased reliance on fossil fuels.

• Added to that, the United Nations-led negotiations on a new global treaty on climate change have stalled. “The significance of climate change in international policy debates is much less pronounced than it was a few years ago,” said Birol.

He urged governments to take action urgently. “This should be a wake-up call. A chance [of staying below 2 degrees] would be if we had a legally binding international agreement or major moves on clean energy technologies, energy efficiency and other technologies.”

Governments are to meet next week in Bonn for the next round of the UN talks, but little progress is expected.

Sir David King, former chief scientific adviser to the UK government, said the global emissions figures showed that the link between rising GDP and rising emissions had not been broken. “The only people who will be surprised by this are people who have not been reading the situation properly,” he said.

Forthcoming research led by Sir David will show the west has only managed to reduce emissions by relying on imports from countries such as China.

Another telling message from the IEA’s estimates is the relatively small effect that the recession – the worst since the 1930s – had on emissions. Initially, the agency had hoped the resulting reduction in emissions could be maintained, helping to give the world a “breathing space” and set countries on a low-carbon path. The new estimates suggest that opportunity may have been missed

CARBON PRICING

April 12th, 2011

 

CARBON PRICING IN AUSTRALIA: WHAT WILL IT TAKE? (The Search Foundation)

I have included this pamphlet from the Search Foundation (an organisation promoting progressive and green politics) because I think it argues the case very well for a carbon pricing scheme in Australia. It is obvious that the big polluters and their political supporters, the Liberal and National Parties don’t want a scheme, but if it gets in, they only want one that will make ordinary Australians pay for and not those who produce the most pollution.

It is important that we green our environment in a way that means the big polluters make the greater contribution. After all, most are making huge profits.

For a greener and fairer future,

Andy Alcock

  

  

Carbon pricing in Australia:

What will it take?

What will be the target?

To avoid runaway climate change, emissions must

be reduced dramatically. The first and critical step

is to reduce emissions by 25-40% from 1990

levels by 2020.

The Labor government’s target is still to reduce

emissions by 5% from 2000 levels by 2020, (same

as Rudd’s 2009 ETS and Abbotts ‘direct action’

plan). This time the target must be higher.

The cabon tax will apply to the 1000 big polluting

companies, not households and individuals.

Who will get compensation?

Rudd’s 2009 scheme included a huge compensation

package for the big polluters. This, and the

low target, were the main reasons the Greens

and many in the community opposed it.

Professor Ross Garnaut has said that the the

inefficient and polluting profiteers in electricity

generation should not be rewarded.

Instead, compensation should go to ordinary

people who would be effected by price rises and

economic restructuring. Garnaut’s proposal is a

good model. It includes a combination of income

tax cuts, pension increases, elimination of poverty

traps for people receiving welfare and working

part-time, and targeted grants to trade-affected

sectors and hard-hit regions.

The noisy opposition: Abbott, carbon polluters and talk-back

radio

The concept of a carbon price or carbon tax has provoked a massive reaction from the Abbott-led opposition, big

polluters and talk-back radio. If a progressive tax reform package emerges from the MPCCC process, there will be

an even more hysterical reaction.

We need huge protests and a mass movement that can demonstrate public support for action on global warming

and an effective scheme that ensures ordinary people are better off. The mass rallies in Melbourne on March 12

and Sydney on April 2 were a good start. Clear public support is vital for the scheme to get through Parliament

when the time comes.

Getting it through Parliament

Labor and the Multi-Party Climate Change

Committee

After the 2010 election Labor won the support of the

Greens and most of the Independents to form government.

One of the major commitments it made was to work

in a Multi-Party Climate Change Committee to put a price

on carbon, either through a tax or some other mechanism.

The MPCCC has begun to put forward its plans for a carbon

tax from 2012-2015, followed by a carbon emissions

trading scheme. This is the first practical policy proposal for

Australia which could stop emissions from increasing and

start to reduce them.

Greens

The Greens’ support for the new carbon pricing initiative

depends on it having a reasonable target and compensation

going to the people who need it, not the big polluters.

Country Independents

Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott want action on global

warming, but want to be confident their constituents

won’t be hurt by reforms. They have already negotiated

the exclusion of the agriculture sector, and should pursue

targeted regional funds as well as tax changes to ensure

there is rural support for the scheme. The WA Farmers

Federation says a carbon tax will be good for agriculture in

the long term in the face of global warming.

Don’t be fooled by Tony

Abbott’s “Direct Action”

Tony Abbott wants to use the problem of global

warming to bring down the Gillard government.

Although Abbott claims he no longer believes

climate change is “crap”, he refused to join the

Multi-Party Climate Change Committee. He calls

his alternative policy “direct action”, but it

doesn’t include any of the complementary

measures that would ensure big cuts in emissions.

Instead it is a pool of money that he

would cut from other Government programs

and allocate to polluters who make small

change to reduce emissions.

Tony Abbott championed the Great Big Tax of

2000 – the 10% GST on almost everything –

because that tax shifted the burden off the rich

and better-off onto the low and middle income

earners. Abbott isn’t against big taxes, he is just

against taxes where the wealthy have to pay

their fair share. That’s why he is vehemently

against the proposed carbon tax – because

some of the biggest corporations would pay the

tax and the low and middle income earners

would receive some of the money – in a way

making a correction for the injustice of

Howard’s GST.

Supplement the carbon price

with regulation and investment

On its own the carbon price or carbon tax is not enough to

ensure a shift from fossil-fuel to renewable energy.

It’s vital that the carbon price is accompanied by other

projects that the environment movement calls “complementary

measures”. This includes:

• regulating for no new coal-fired power stations

• regulating for higher fuel efficiency standards

• providing more public transport and fewer freeways

• regulating for more efficient buildings and

• directly funding the construction of reliable renewable

energy systems, with public and cooperative ownership.

These measures reduce emissions and create good jobs at

the same time, and must be part of a package of action on

global warming. The carbon price or carbon tax will interact

positively with these “complementary measures”.

However the proposed emissions trading scheme from

2015 may turn out to be a very weak mechanism, because

it allows the cost of “emission permits” to “float”, the way

the Australian dollar “floats”. The price may fall below the

fixed carbon price that will exist from 2012-2015, and

polluters may simply buy “permits” overseas and not

reduce emissions in Australia! Worse, speculators who

don’t own carbon-emitting industries will be free to buy

and sell permits.

A carbon price is a market mechanism to discourage carbon pollution and encourage investment in renewable

energy production.

Global warming can only be addressed by binding global agreements to reduce emissions. A decisive step

forward by Australia now will greatly assist the global negotiation to move forward from the disaster of

Copenhagen. The next major UN meeting on climate change is in Durban, South Africa in December.

Politically the carbon price is important because the fate of the Gillard minority government – and of the

Greens and the country Independents – is tied to its success, while the fate of Abbott as opposition leader is

tied to its defeat. There will be no holds barred in the fight to get it through Parliament.

Carbon pricing in Australia:

Transforming the debate

There will be a progressive ecological and social

outcome only if the broad community is engaged

in the argument and is willing to take

action. This means transforming the debate

about global warming from an environment

debate to a community debate, where ordinary

people clearly identify that the change will be

better for them than no change. This means that

The

 

 

SEARCH Foundation can help formulate policy details and link up the different community and unionorganisations who can identify with them. Contact us at admin@search.org.au or (02) 9211 4164. www.search.org.au

there must be delivery of job security, income support and

assistance to use renewable energy and to improve energy

efficiency.

Winning a carbon price, campaigning for non-market

“complementary measures” and ensuring a good compensation

package is a practical way to challenge the dominance

of “market ideology” in our society.

No-one should be compensated with our tax dollars for

polluting the atmosphere!

 

FILM REVIEW: STRANGE BIRDS IN PARADISE – A WEST PAPUAN STORY

March 3rd, 2011

 

This film has taken a long time to reach Australia even though it was produced by Australians.

The Adelaide premiere of Strange Birds in Paradise occurred on 27 February 2011and it was a great event.

An Adelaide reviewer of the film claimed that it is a documentary made by activists and that it is crammed with too many facts.

I strongly disagree with this description. This is an important documentary that shows the genocide being perpetrated by the Indonesian military (TNI) on a race of people who are close neighbours to Australia – the people of West Papua. Australians, especially our political leaders, need to be confronted with this film because the Australian Government is giving financial support to KOPASSUS or the Special Indonesian Forces of the TNI that are responsible for the mass murder and human rights abuses that continue to be perpetrated in West Papua.

It should be noted that KOPASSUS was also responsible for the major crimes committed against the people of Timor Leste during its 24 years of occupation by the TNI , Acheh and parts of traditional Indonesia like the Maluku Province (the Moluccan Islands).

This documentary is different to most. It reveals the history of West Papua through the interaction of West Papuan exiles living in Melbourne who share their independence songs and their music generally with well known Australian rock musicologist David Bridie of Not Drowning Waving and My Friend the Chocolate Cake fame.

The film features  two West Papuan refugees. One is Donny Roem, a recent exile from West Papua who escaped his homeland by crossing the Arafura Sea to Australia with his two young brothers and 42 other refugees in a homemade canoe.

The other is Jacob Rumbiak, who is considered as the leader of the West Papuan government-in-exile. He was a was a child soldier in the West Papuan resistance movement, OPM (Organisasi Papua Merdeka or Free Papua Movement) and has spent 11 years in Indonesian prisons .  His story is a saga of oppression and torture, which ends in his escape from East Timor. 

The film is directed by Charlie Hill-Smith, an Australian writer, cartoonist and comedian who has a strong interest in the many cultures of Indonesian and has forged close friendships with Jacob and Donny along with the Javanese families he met as a teenage exchange student.

He uses his visits to West Papua and Indonesia as backdrops to introduce the story of West Papua There are interviews with key academics like Professor Damien Kingsbury an expert on Indonesia, West Papua and East Timor

The documentary uses  archival film footage along with some footage of Charlie’s early trips to Java, animated cartoons and artwork of the characters from Indonesian mythology as shadow puppets to present the history about West Papua. Throughout the film we hear West Papuan music including a number of independence songs.

The occcupation of the country began in 1962 when Indonesian forces entered the country at a time when the Netherlands government was preparing the Papuans for self rule. The first massacres were carried out by the TNI within a few months of its arrival.

Because of support from the US, Indonesia was able remain in control until there was a UN supervised Act of Free Choice  in 1969.  The whole exercise was a farce and a very brutal one for the locals.

The Indonesian military organised the exercise. They arranged for 1,054 representatives to represent towns and villages across the country. These people were brought to the capital, Jaya Pura, where there was a vote that was supposedly supervised by the UN. Tragically, the UN contingent.was too small and was unable to monitor all the actions of the TNI within Jaya Pura – let alone the rest of the country.

A unanimous vote for integration was reached because many of the representatives alleged they were threatened and blackmailed by Indonesian soldiers to ensure a pro-Indonesian outcome. There were reports of the TNI using threats and brutality against those who opposed being incorporated into Indonesia. Many people who protested publicly were reported to have gone missing at the time and have never been heard of since.

Soon after, the region was renamed, “West Irian”, and became the 26th province of Indonesia with full United Nations and international recognition.

The documentary includes information about the brutal behaviour towards the locals and tells the stories of two famous West Papuan. One is Arnold Ap, a noted  anthropologist,  musician, OPM supporter and national  hero, who was murdered by the TNI in 1984. 

The other is Theys Eluay, a more recent leader who was suffocated by the TNI in 2001.

Also mentioned is the fact that if West Papuans raise their Morning Star flag as a protest to the continuing Indonesian occupation, they are likely to be shot or be given lengthy terms of imprisonment.

This film is meant to confront viewers with the long term suffering of the West Papuans and to question why this should be allowed to continue. Of course, this state of affairs continues because Indonesia is a client state of the US and because the US and other western nation along with the TNI are exploiting West Papua’s vast mineral and natural resources.

After the Adelaide premiere, the 160 attending gave the film a sustained applause.

The event was followed by a short period of questions and discussion with the makers of the film. People were urged to contact politicians to raise the issue of the ongoing human rights abuses occurring on our doorstep in West Papua. Key demands should be to urge the Australian Government to stop all military cooperation with the TNI, to raise this in the UN to call for an international cessation of military aid to and cooperation with the TNI and a demand that the TNI  withdraw from the country and allow the West Papuans to have a genuine UN administered referendum to decide their own future and to call for the UN to establish an international war crimes tribunal to bring war criminals in the TNI to justice.

Evidently, DVDs of Strange Birds will soon be on sale. I would urge people to purchase it and show it to friends, families, union branches, church, human rights and social justice  groups etc.

The documentary will also appear shortly on SBS TV.

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

Member AWPA (SA)

Information Officer

Australia East Timor Friendship Association SA Inc

 

WEST PAPUA – SOME PERSONAL EXPERIENCES

Although I have never visited West Papua, I feel as though I have become a strong supporter of this nation’s struggle for independence and freedom from the Indonesian military (TNI).

I first became aware of the Indonesian military in our region when I was a student. After the Suharto coup of 1965 in Indonesia and the subsequent bloodbath along with the US war in Indo China, I was shaken out of my political apathy.

During the middle to late 1960s, the Australian Student Christian Movement (ASCM) published a newsletter, Political Concern, which was edited by Helen Hill, who was later to write much about East Timor. Political Concern provided a great deal of information about the key political issues of the day and highlighted the crimes against human rights that were being committed by the Indonesian military. It looked fairly basic given that it appeared to have been copied onto blotting paper, however, it provided information about the situation in Indonesia that was not appearing in the daily Australian media

Between 1973-4 I worked in Malaysia as an Australian volunteer teacher and during that time visited Sumatra and Java. 

I first read about West Papua in a progressive politics journal Retrieval that was published by left wing Christians in Melbourne and Sydney. It existed for 6 or 7 years between the early to late 1970s. The editorial board had a novel approach to providing people with information.Various people were responsible for reviewing articles in specific newspapers and journal and these reviews were then printed in Retrieval. Often there would be several reviews of stories related to the same topic. It was then easy to get a rapid overview of a particular event wirh the reviews of the story from different sources and opinions.

If readers wanted more in-depth information, they could obtain the original source.

Retrieval was the idea of Geoffrey Lacey, an engineer I met in Sydney and the editor was Val Noone, a former Catholic priest in Melbourne who is now an academic historian of Australian and Irish history.

Topics in the magazine included the issues of war, peace social justice, human rights, independence movements across the world and the environment. Some specific issues that I recall were the US war Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, the coup in Chile, many environmental issues such as environmental health, problems related with the car, the behaviour of multinational corporations eg Rio Tinto Zinc, the movement for a united Ireland, Palestinian human rights etc. 

Because of my involvement in the Vietnam anti war movement and my experiences in Asia, I had the role of reviewing some Asian papers.

It was due to this great little magazine that I learned more about West Papua. In early 1975, I heard a program about East Timor on Lateline, then an ABC National radio program. That edition looked at Timor’s independence from Portugal in 1974 and raised the question abourt Suharto’s intentions regarding this tiny nation that had supported Australia so strongly during World War 2. Listeners heard how Indonesia was inviting the East Timorese to become incorporated into Indonesia. The Indonesian dictatorship was giving the invitation by beaming radio broadcasts into East Timor. These broadcast invitations were not of the cordial type by any means; they began and ended with machine gun fire!

I felt sickened when I heard that program and felt that I had to do something given that I was aware of the 1965 bloodbath that accompanied Suharto’s grab for power and I observed the ever present and threatening TNI when I visited Sumatra and Java. Also, during my time in Malaysia, I had come across frequent references to Timor in the Asian media and I thought that I might spend some time there on my return home after my volunteer contract finished.

As it turned out, I had almost exhausted my finances as volunteers in Malaysia did not receive very much in the way of wages. I therefore flew home via Jakarta and spent just a few days looking at a small part of Java.

In preparing what became the first article on Timor prepared for Retrieval, I had to do a lot of research into the history and geography of the island. This was rather difficult because in those days not much had been written about Timor. In my search, I came across an amazing article by Hugh Lunn, a journalist with The Australian, about his experiences when he was in West Papua during 1969 while covering the story of the so called Act of Free Choice. I was certain after reading Lunn’s horrifying account of what happened that the TNI was certain to invade East Timor. My article gave an overview of the history and geography of Timor, the information in the Lateline program and Hugh Lunn’s article.

The article was published and as a result, I was recruited to the Campaign for an Independent East Timor in South Australia [CIET (SA) Inc] in May 1975 by Bob Hanney, who was the secretary group for the major part of the time the group existed. After East Timor won its independence in 2002, CIET became known as the Australia East Timor Friendship Association (SA) Inc [AETFA SA Inc] and still exists today.In early 1977, I was invited by the ASCM to attend its national annual conference as a resource person. The theme of the conference was Asia and it was held at the old Tatachilla Winery, in the SA wine growing area of McLaren Vale.  

At the conference, I met some very interesting people who were very knowledgeable about Asia and Indonesia and West Papua in particular. One was Professor Herb Feith, a Jew,  a refugee, a survivor of  Nazi concentration camps, an early Australian volunteer in Indonesia and politics professor at Monash University. Herb was a fluent speaker of Bahasa Indonesia and had witnessed at first hand the aftermath of the 1965 events in Indonesia.

Another was Jack Rumere, an exiled West Papuan living in Melbourne and a former OPM guerilla fighter.  Jack told me stories of the fighting he had been involved in between the OPM and the TNI and explained how dreadful  the living conditions were for ordinary West Papuans as a result of TNI brutality and corruption. I was very interested in what both men told me.

Towards the end of the conference, Jack suggested that I should visit West Papua. He told me that he could arrange for me to meet West Papuan refugees in PNG who would get me over the PNG/WP border illegally where I would be able to stay in an OPM camp. As it turned out, the West Papuans I met at Wewak needed more much time to get me across the border than I had. I was on holidays, but they were almost at an end and I needed to return to Australia to resume work.

However, the visit was not entirely wasted. I did have long talks with key West Papuan refugees at Wewak and gained a greater insight into their independence struggle . One night a group met for dinner and decided to have a music session. A number of people who attende brought thei guitars and they sang a number of their independence and guerilla songs for me. Fortunately, I had borrowed a small tape recorder from Denis Freney, probably the then most important activist for East Timor solidarity in Australia. The West Papuans wanted to know what was happening in East Timor as they considered that they were allies with the East Timorese in their common struggle for independence against the TNI.

Towards the end of the evening, the leader of the group read out a message of solidarity to FRETILIN, the key political party in East Timor that was organising the resistance to the TNI. Most of their songs and the message were in Indonesian.

There were some very amusing incidents in relation to my visit because the West Papuan refugees thought they might have problems with the PNG authoritieswho were under pressure by Indonesia to send the refugees back. In previous times a number were returned and many were machine gunned to death by the TNI.

After my return from PNG, Denis Freney arranged for the recording of the songs and the message to be sent over the illegal radio in Australia maintained by East Timor supporters with the Timorese resistance during the early days of the TNI occupation.

Shortly after, Denis took the tape with him to a conference in Europe where he met many Indonesian political exiles. Like the West Papuans I visited, they held a music evening and sang a number of songs in solidarity with the West Papuans and the East Timorese. Denis recorded the event and copies were made for those working in solidarity for both East Timor and West Papua.

The CIET (SA) Committee decided that whenever we were protesting against the actions of the TNI that we should mention both the East Timorese and the West Papuans. Our group also kept in touch with a small West Papuan support group in Melbourne.

In 1986, Bev Hall, a supporter of CIET (SA) visited Sweden where she met the exiled OPM guerilla commander, Jakob Prai. This resulted in a hurried Australian tour by Jakob Prai and two other other West Papuan exiles, John Ondawame and Nicholas Messett in late 1986 and early 1987 which was organised by our committee. We were not able to raise much money and with a very tight budget, most of their travel was by bus except for Tasmania. The West Papuan tour would not have been possible without the then independent Green member in the Tasmanian Parliament, Bob Brown. He kindly lent us a sum of $500, which was a lot of money at the time.

The tour began in Adelaide and a huge crowd attended a meeting in a community centre in St Peters to hear the West Papuans speak and to partake of a hangi, a Melanesian feast where the food is cooked underground on hot rocks.  The West Papuan delegation also visited Canberra, Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart as well as Adelaide

Also working with the CIET (SA) Committee on the tour was Jack Rumere, who by that time was working in Adelaide. Sadly Jack died from cancer a few years later. His widow Debbie, is a member of Australia West Papua Association (SA).

In the past few years, the Australia West Papua Association (AWPA) exists in Australia’s capital cities. In Adelaide, there is an active group and one of its key members is David Arkins, who years ago worked on the illegal solidarity radio with FRETILIN. I myself am a member of the AWPA as well as being active in AETFA. The two groups work together quite closely because we realise that the two have something in common. They are both suffering because of the actions of the TNI and it is crucial to cooperate together to ensure that all victims of the TNI , whether they be West Papuans, East Timorese, Achinese or Indonesians, receive justice and that the criminals in the TNI are punished for the crimes they have committed and that they are made to compensate the victims of their crimes.

The key demands that we have to work for are:

* the Australian Government must stop all military cooperation with the TNI and raise this in the UN to call for an international cessation of military aid to and cooperation with the TNI until all the

  alleged war criminals in its ranks are brought to justice

* the UN must demand that the TNI  withdraw from West Papua and allow its people to have a genuine UN administered referendum to decide their own future

* the UN must establish an international war crimes tribunal to bring the alleged war criminals in the TNI to justice and to make them compensate the victims of their crimes

Indonesia cannot be considered to be a properly functioning democracy until the TNI become subservient to the elected government and the Indonesian Government takes responsibility for the crimes that the TNI has committed.

We cannot have peace and social justice in the SE Asian and Pacific region of the world until the key demands above are realised and we cannot claim to be truly committed to democracy, peace and international social justice unless we support them.

Papua Barat – Merdeka!

Viva Timor Leste Independente!

Andrew (Andy) Alcock

 .