NEW APPROACHES TO ECONOMICS

 

The Editor
The Adelaide Review
GPO Box 651

ADELAIDE SA 5001

editor@adelaidereview.com.au

Dear Sir/Madam
RE: LETTER TO THE EDITOR – NEW APPROACHES TO ECONOMICS

Along with others who want to see our international economic
system adopt more humane and fairer economics, I was  interested to read John Spoehr’s article, Debt and the Global Financial Crisis (The Adelaide
Review October 2011) about Ann Pettifor, a co-founder of Jubilee 2000 and the Green New Deal Group. 

I was particularly pleased you printed John’s article as I had
intended being at her Adelaide meeting, but was unable to do so. John’s article inspired me to do some further reading about Ann’s work and I discovered that she is also
a fellow of nef (The New Economics Foundation) and that she shares ideas about the current international economic crisis on her blog Debtonation.org.
nef is an independent think-and-do tank with the slogan “economics as if people and the planet mattered” and it aims to improve quality of life by promoting innovative solutions that challenge mainstream thinking on economic, environment and social issues. It works in partnership with many sections of the UK society and internationally to create more understanding and strategies for change that increase the well-being of people and the environmental sustainability of the planet. 
It seems that there are now a number of groups of internationally renowned economists who have similar aims and are campaigning for better economic outcomes for “the wretched of the earth”.
Another initiative that I discovered recently is a group promoting what they term as the Robin Hood Tax. This campaign is being promoted by NGOs (Non Government Organisations) and progressive economists and politicians internationally.

One of its major supporters should be well known to Adelaideans. I refer to Professor Geoff Harcourt, Emeritus Professor of Economics at the University of Adelaide and Emeritus Reader in the History of Economic Theory at Cambridge University. He was well known as a leading figure in the Campaign for Peace in Vietnam and the Vietnam Moratorium in SA during the 1960s and 1970s.
Geoff is also known internationally for the major contributions he has made to
the understanding of the ideas of the economists, Maynard Keynes and Joan
Robinson as well as his commitment to international economic justice.
The Robin Hood Tax is a package of financial transaction taxes which supporters say could be implemented globally, regionally or unilaterally by individual nations.  But there is another way. Thousands of Robin Hood Tax
campaigners believe that banks, hedge funds and the rest of the financial sector should pay their fair share to clear up the international economic mess they helped create.
Currently, the main proposals are:
* A Financial Transaction Tax (FTT)
  This type of tax involves a very small tax of about
0.05% on transactions like stocks, bonds, foreign currency
and  derivatives. It is thought this
  could  raise £250 billion a year globally. Its proponents say it has the advantages of being well tested, cheap to implement and hard to avoid.

  It is also thought that Transaction taxes  will reduce the number of the most risky transactions occurring which helped to trigger the recent financial  crises.

A Bank Levy

This is basically a flat-rate levy imposed on large financial institutions. Under huge pressure from their voters and from campaigners, a number of countries, including the UK, France and Germany have already introduced a bank levy, but at rates that have not raised nearly enough to be effective in helping the poor and the planet.

* The Financial Activities Tax (FAT)

  Supporters of this tax claim that it could raise billions through taxing excess profits and remuneration. Broadly, it is equivalent to a GST-type tax, but that it is only levied on the financial sector. It is estimated that it could raise £3.9 billion a year in the UK alone – and up to $93 billion across the OECD countries. The UK government has said it is open to implementing a FAT tax, but only together with a group of other countries, for example at EU level.

I believe that if we want to develop programs that will effectively combat world poverty and protect our environment, these initiatives should be strongly supported. Such taxes would not impose an extra financial burden on the poorest in the world community, but would ensure that super wealthy individuals and corporations, including those who currently pay very
little or no tax because of legal loop-holes, would contribute their fair share into combatting

poverty and improving the world’s environment.  

Yours sincerely

Andrew (Andy) Alcock


Posted on October 19th, 2011
» Feed to this thread
» Trackback

Leave a Reply